By Rebecca Baker | June 6, 2017
Tough zoning rules for adult establishments in New York City do not violate the constitutional rights of affected businesses, the state's highest court ruled Tuesday.
By Michael Booth | June 6, 2017
The New Jersey Supreme Court has agreed to determine whether a county's policy of giving historic preservation grants to local churches violates state constitutional requirements mandating the separation of church and state.
By Lizzy McLellan | June 5, 2017
Presidential politics may have helped drive a top media partner at Holland & Knight to jump to Ballard Spahr.
By Jenna Greene | June 5, 2017
For such a frequent litigant, Donald Trump sure does stink at being a client. It's a standard instruction, for god's sake. Don't talk about your case. Keep your mouth shut and let your lawyers do their thing.
By Todd Cunningham | June 5, 2017
Robert Barnes, a California attorney best known for celebrity tax defense, is representing Cassandra Fairbanks in a defamation suit that centers on a tweet.
By Marcia Coyle | June 5, 2017
The employee retirement plans of religious-affiliated nonprofits are exempt from the protections and requirements of the federal pension law, a…
By Greg Land | June 5, 2017
The Georgia Supreme Court has ruled that local sales and use taxes on motor fuels used to underwrite much of the hard-fought transportation package shepherded through the General Assembly by Gov. Nathan Deal and legislative leaders in 2015 are not constitutionally required to be used only for roads and bridges.
By Ross Todd | June 5, 2017
In , the high court will address whether authorities need a warrant to get records showing which cell towers a suspect's device accessed.
By Marcia Coyle | June 5, 2017
The employee retirement plans of religious-affiliated nonprofits are exempt from the protections and requirements of the federal pension law, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday. The decision was a blow to multimillion-dollar class actions that seek to hold those plans liable for violating the federal law.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | June 2, 2017
Plaintiff's as applied challenge to 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(4) under the Second Amendment failed because he could not meet the second prong of step one under the 'Marzzarella' framework since he could not produce sufficient evidence to distinguish himself from the historically barred class as he had no record of responsible firearms usage and he had undergone continuing mental health treatment. Motion to dismiss granted.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Yardi is a global software company providing innovative property management solutions and services in every real estate market. We are focus...
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A. is a Boutique Wage and Hour Litigation law firm. Candidates should have 2-3 years litigation experience. The ex...
McHenry & Horan, P.C. is a legacy medical malpractice defense firm with offices in Uniondale, NY. We are well respected for our expertis...