By David Gialanella | September 20, 2017
A New Jersey auto body shop owner's pleas that he was sucked into a contract of adhesion by Sherwin-Williams was in need of some polish, a federal judge has ruled in awarding the paint supplier $473,832 in damages.
By Gabrielle Orum Hernández | September 20, 2017
The company is looking to bring contract analysis a little further up the contract lifecycle.
By Gabrielle Orum Hernández | September 19, 2017
The firm recently inked a deal with Kira Systems to parse contracts in complex acquisitions and capital raises.
By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | September 19, 2017
Breach of Contract Claim Failed; Beneficial Owner of Purchaser Lacked Authority
By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | September 19, 2017
Defendant Obligated to Pay Contract Where Agreement Created No Condition Precedent
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | September 19, 2017
Trial court properly held that elderly parents had no legal obligation to pay for their severely autistic adult son's care in appellant's Pennsylvania facility after New Jersey department of disabilities ceased paying because the services were not rendered to parents personally, they never contracted to pay for the services, New Jersey had the most significant contacts in the controversy and the New Jersey filial support law applied, and parents experienced no personal enrichment so appellant's quantum meruit claim failed. Affirmed.
By Stephen M. Kramarsky | September 18, 2017
In his Intellectual Property column, Stephen M. Kramarsky writes: In a recent case in the Southern District of New York against ride-hailing company Uber and its CEO, the court denied Uber's motion to compel arbitration, holding that its sign-up process did not adequately notify users of its terms of service (which contained the arbitration provision). The Second Circuit's review and vacatur of that decision examines these issues in the context of the "reasonable smartphone user," and it is worth a closer look.
By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | September 12, 2017
Settlement Did Not Bar Affirmative Defense in Absence of Explicit Release
By Brenda Sapino Jeffreys | September 12, 2017
Andrew Raish, who formerly worked at Walne Law in Houston, sued the firm for up to $1 million, alleging he is entitled to a 25 percent fee from a lawsuit.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | September 12, 2017
Under the Gist of Action Doctrine, plaintiffs were barred from pursuing their claims of failure to perform in a workmanlike manner/negligence against defendants since the alleged negligence arose out of a duty created by a contractual relationship. The court granted defendants' preliminary objections in part.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...