New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Curtis B. Leitner | September 19, 2023
In his March 2023 column, Curtis Leitner discussed how the trial court in 'Cresco' bucked the principle that damages from a breach of a preliminary "agreement to agree" are limited to out-of-pocket costs—however, the First Department reversed this decision in June. This column addresses that reversal.
By Riley Brennan | September 18, 2023
This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.
By Allison Dunn | September 15, 2023
"[M]y own view is that she should have given [the ring] back," Associate Justice James R. Milkey wrote of the former bride-to-be in a dissenting opinion. "But why should my personal view on this issue matter? To me, the ultimate question this case poses is whether such issues should be resolved in courts of law, or instead left to the interplay between private conscience and social norms."
Delaware Business Court Insider
By ALM Staff | September 11, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By Mason Lawlor | September 8, 2023
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia has allowed only a portion of small technology company Card Isle's copyright infringement lawsuit against Edible Arrangements to proceed past summary judgment.
By Allison Dunn | September 6, 2023
"We disagree that the prenuptial agreement is invalid on its face—i.e., we disagree that the prenuptial agreement is categorically unenforceable under any and all circumstances. We also disagree that the prenuptial agreement is unenforceable under the circumstances presented in this particular case," the appeals court wrote.
By Adolfo Pesquera | September 6, 2023
On Friday, the court informed Locke Lord the defendants' motion for summary judgment would be granted and requested a draft order for the court's approval.
By ALM Staff | September 6, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By Allison Dunn | September 1, 2023
"Under the circumstances, the court sees no alternative but to grant the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. While that is not an obviously sensible result, it is required by the terms of the policy and by Massachusetts law," Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV wrote.
By Riley Brennan | August 24, 2023
"Not all case-staffing decisions are commercial in nature; the nuances of assigning work to associates and paralegals within a firm is a matter of legal discretion," the court wrote. "However, when a law firm makes factual representations about case staffing in order to obtain a client, as is alleged here, that is commercial conduct."
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Winkler Kurtz, LLP, a Port Jefferson Station law firm, seeks a Matrimonial Associate Attorney to provide assistance and be involved in all a...
NORTHERN NEW JERSEY LAW FIRM WITH PRACTICE LIMITED TO REPRESENTATION OF ACCIDENT VICTIMS AND INJURED WORKERS SEEKS A WORKERS COMPENSATION A...
We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...