By ALM Staff | February 14, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
Delaware Business Court Insider
By ALM Staff | February 13, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By ALM Staff | February 13, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By Curtis Leitner and MarcAnthony Bonanno | February 10, 2023
'Morpheus' and 'Dominik' raise the prospect that courts—and certainly parties litigating an investment banking fee—will be tempted to stack the deck in favor of a vague and fact-specific procuring cause standard. Once again, bankers beware.
By Allison Dunn | February 9, 2023
Finding courts in the First Circuit have yet to address the framework for determining whether online terms were sufficiently disclosed to provide a consent defense to a Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts relied on recent Ninth Circuit case law in allowing a putative class action to proceed.
By Riley Brennan | February 8, 2023
"This decision clarifies the law relative to exclusive agreement in this context and will likely prevent needless litigation over damages recoverable in similar situations," said the attorney for the plaintiff, Charles G. Devine Jr., of Devine Barrows, of Wellesley, Massachusetts.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Alan Feigenbaum | February 7, 2023
The path towards trying to achieve unbreakable, or "ironclad" agreements for our clients may have just gotten a lot more treacherous in New York.
New York Law Journal | Expert Opinion
By Peter E. Fisch and Salvatore Gogliormella | February 7, 2023
Buyers and sellers of real estate must consider how legal principles pertaining to fraud might affect sellers' liability for any false statements made in the context of their transactions.
By Michael A. Mora | February 6, 2023
John H. Ruiz allegedly told the LifeWallet founder to consider the deal binding as a "gentleman's agreement," because the asset purchase agreement could not yet be signed due to the public offering, according to the lawsuit.
By Jason Grant | February 3, 2023
"Given the allegations that Morelli acknowledged the dispute [over the additional 10% contingency fee] multiple times, [Morelli Law Firm's] arguments regarding the possible binding effect of the fee letter, and defendant's possible ratification thereof, raise issues of fact," said Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Louis Nock.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Search for the President and Dean California Western School of Law San Diego, California California Western School of Law (California ...
Duane Morris LLP has an opening for an associate with 2-3 years of experience with strong capital markets and corporate transactional backgr...
Our client, an established provider of professional liability insurance, has engaged us to identify a highly-qualified Senior Bad Faith Tria...