New Fenwick Report Highlight's Silicon Valley Proxy Season Results
A new report from Fenwick & West shows the change in Silicon Valley's boardrooms post-2018 proxy season.
October 16, 2018 at 05:46 PM
3 minute read
Fenwick & West has released its 2018 report on proxy season results in SV 150 and S&P 100 companies, which highlighted changes in director approval ratings, “say on pay” voting and stockholder proposals.
David Bell, the Fenwick partner who authored the report, said 2018's support for director stats stood out to him.
“Support for director elections tightened up this year compared to prior years. The difference between the S&P 100 and SV150 became very small, maybe half a percent in the difference in the average percentage that both directors got. That had been a little wider last year,” he said.
But there is division when it comes to “say on pay” voting. In 2018, opposition to named executive officer compensation reached or exceeded 15 percent of the board's votes cast in more than one-fifth of SV 150 companies, compared to 13.8 percent of S&P 100 companies.
When more than 15 percent are “against,” Bell said, “that's a wake-up call for those companies.”
He added that this opposition can stem from poor market performance, revenue decreases or board members who feel that compensation isn't adequately tied to performance.
“To observers on the outside, it appears that stock performance is the biggest driver in how year to year changes in voting take place at individual companies around 'say on pay,'” Bell said. “Most companies do 'say on pay' annually, although in the SV 150 there are a decent amount of companies that do it every three years.”
Companies often recommend the annual “say on pay” structure in the wake of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Bell noted. But some see compensation as a long-term decision, meaning a three-year vote is more appealing.
“For companies who think maybe three years is a more appropriate time frame, there are stockholders out there that support that,” he said.
The past year also saw an increase in shareholder proposals, especially around diversity and anti-discrimination. There were eight such proposals in the SV 150. While none of them successfully passed, the average percent of votes cast for diversity proposals more than doubled, up to 34.3 percent.
Bell said that it's rare for such a proposal to pass—almost no policy issues on any category passed—but the fact that there are more proposals with increasing support is a sign of change.
Even if they don't pass, Bell noted that efforts to get such proposals passed “will often change behavior at companies,” with or without a policy in place.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250