After Alleged Bribe Wins Contract, Loser Fights Back With RICO Suit
If it succeeds, the case could pave the way for similar racketeering suits by other companies against their competitors over criminal behavior.
February 21, 2020 at 03:55 PM
4 minute read
A competing construction firm has filed a novel racketeering lawsuit in Miami accusing another firm of stealing its profits by paying bribes to get $1.8 billion worth of government contracts in post-hurricane Puerto Rico.
The case could pave the way for similar racketeering suits by other companies against their competitors over criminal behavior.
MasTec Renewables Puerto Rico, a subsidiary of Miami-based MasTec Inc., sued Mammoth Energy Services Inc. and its Puerto Rican subsidiary, Cobra Acquisitions, on Jan. 21 in U.S. District Court in Miami. Mammoth is based in Oklahoma City.
MasTec, which is run by the family of the late Miami political powerbroker Jorge Mas, is relying on federal bribery charges brought last September against Cobra's former president. Donald Keith Ellison. Also indicted were Ahsha Tribble, the Federal Emergency Management Administration's regional administrator, and a friend of Tribble's who was hired by Ellison.
The trio was indicted on a total of 15 counts of fraud, bribery and other charges related to the Puerto Rican contracts. Their trial is scheduled for January 2021 in U.S. District Court in Puerto Rico.
The MasTec suit states that the restoration of power to the island was delayed because Tribble allegedly accepted bribes from Ellison to direct the work to Cobra, a company that was incorporated only two days before the first contract was assigned to it.
Cobra "had virtually no experience with large scale electric infrastructure restoration, disaster cleanup, or emergency response," the suit states. "Inexplicably, Cobra was selected over MasTec—a renowned and well-respected complex infrastructure contractor with more than fifty years of relevant experience—to perform all emergency electrical work funded by FEMA in the immediate aftermath of the storm."
Another $500 million contract was awarded to MasTec, but that work was diverted to Cobra as well. So MasTec lost not only the $500 million from the contract but also money spent on "a massive mobilization effort, incurring millions of dollars of costs, to position itself to immediately assist the ravaged island in desperate need of repair," the suit says.
Besides violations of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, the MasTec suit alleges tortious interference by Cobra.
David Orta, of the Washington, D.C., office of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, is representing Mammoth and Cobra in the suit. Orta did not immediately return messages Friday seeking comment.
Benjamin Widlanski, of the Coral Gables law firm Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton, is representing MasTec. He declined to comment.
"RICO cases are rare, and none I've seen have facts like this," said Houston attorney Ryan McConnell, a former federal prosecutor who founded the R. McConnell Group, which focuses on white-collar crime and compliance cases. "I think it's innovative, and if successful, could pave the way for more of these types of 'victim' cases against companies" involved in crimes.
McConnell, who occasionally writes a column for Corporate Counsel, said general counsel should "include these lawsuits as a risk [related to] potential criminal cases, including the monetary costs and business disruptions that accompany additional litigation."
He added, "One could imagine all sorts of fact patterns where the legal theory could apply involving different types of criminal conduct."
Racketeering charges, while rare, have been involved in other suits against companies. Last November General Motors Co. filed a federal racketeering suit against Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV, alleging a conspiracy to bribe union officials to GM's detriment.
In 2018 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. agreed to pay $250 million to settle a racketeering suit that accused the company and one of its in-house counsel of manipulating the election of an Illinois Supreme Court justice in order to overturn a previous verdict against State Farm.
Alcoa Inc. agreed to pay $85 million in 2012 to settle a bribe-related racketeering suit brought by competitor Aluminium Bahrain BSC, owned by the Bahraini government.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Red Robin CLO Joins Norton Rose Fulbright After Helping Sell Latest Employer for $4.9 Billion
3D-Printed Homebuilder ICON Hires Former Tesla, Amazon Lawyer as GC
Trending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250