11th Circuit: Public College VP's Internal Comments Not Protected Speech
A federal appellate court has held that a former Miami Dade College vice president's complaints about possible ethical issues concerning its president were not protected free speech because they were made internally and not publicly. If Adis M. Vila had made the comments to the news media or the public, they would have been protected under the First Amendment, the court said. The 11th Circuit panel's unanimous ruling April 20 relied heavily on a controversial U.S. Supreme Court ruling from last June.Chinese Companies Catching the Silicon Valley Cachet
Attracted by the region's talent, entrepreneurial history and venture capital, a new crop of Chinese-owned companies is beginning to set down roots in California's Silicon Valley. Extra legal work is often created around intellectual property, according to Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati partner Carmen Chang. Working through federal laws that forbid Chinese companies from buying certain technologies, and restrict the licensing and use of certain types of IP is keeping many of the area's top firms busy.Law Firms Must Be Wary of Relying Too Heavily on the 'Big Client'
With the upcoming closing of LeBeouf Lamb Greene & MacRae's Pittsburgh site, some may be asking why the office -- which opened in 1993 to devote itself to Alcoa Inc.'s national litigation work -- didn't develop a client base in the city extending beyond Alcoa. In a market where businesses are bought, merge, go public, go bankrupt or simply change counsel, firms must be careful about depending on a sole client to produce a significant percentage of their revenue. But what constitutes "significant"?Justices OK "Pay-for-Delay" Generic Pharma Deals
The U.S. Supreme Court gave something to both sides in a closely watched dispute over so-called "pay-for-delay" agreements between brand-name and generic drug manufacturers that put off the production of generics in return payments by brand-name patent holders.Google Loses Bid to Dismiss Skyhook Antitrust Claims Over Smartphone Positioning Technology
Last September Boston-based Skyhook Wireless filed a pair of suits against Google related to Skyhook's smartphone positioning technology, XPS. If Google didn't take Skyhook seriously then, we're betting it does now: On May 2 Boston state court judge Judith Fabricant denied Google's motion for summary judgment or dismissal of Skyhook's antitrust suit.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250