By Zack Needles | September 13, 2020
Six months into the pandemic, trial-by-video-jury—at least in the civil context—is morphing from experiment to expectation. And while lawyers aren't totally sold on the concept, a growing chorus of judges is making clear that it may be the only way to keep their dockets moving.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | September 13, 2020
We urge the Appellate Division to change to video proceedings until we can see them in person.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | September 13, 2020
We believe that the safer course is to await the projected months necessary for a vaccine to become available to the public before the general load of jury cases resumes.
Connecticut Law Tribune | Analysis
By Robert Storace | September 11, 2020
Statistics from the Connecticut Judicial Branch show that pending criminal and civil cases have skyrocketed from August 2019 to August 2020. COVID-19 is a big contributor to the jump, officials said.
By Vanessa Blum | Zack Needles | September 11, 2020
If videoconferencing can make court proceedings more efficient and less expensive, isn't it worth considering?
By Ryan Tarinelli | September 11, 2020
This year the event will focus on the importance of "publicly funded civil legal services in confronting the civil justice crisis resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic," the hearing notice said.
By C. Ryan Barber | September 11, 2020
"The court should not allow itself to become an instrument of the government's abuse of the judicial process or the public trust," Debevoise & Plimpton partner and former judge John Gleeson wrote in Friday's filing.
By Victoria Hudgins | September 11, 2020
Is court reporting technology the hottest investment in legal tech? Not really. But industry observers say the sector is ripe for disruption, and growth.
By Jane Wester | September 10, 2020
The Judicial Friends found that Black people are underrepresented in high-ranking positions in the court system, including judicial and non-judicial roles.
By Cheryl Miller | September 9, 2020
"Binding precedent from the Supreme Court and uniform decisions of multiple federal circuits squarely foreclose appellees' suggestion that the First Amendment applies here," Charles Cooper of the boutique Cooper & Kirk told the Ninth Circuit in the transparency fight.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Our client, a thriving personal injury firm known for its commitment to compassionate client care is seeking an attorney with 5+ years of ex...
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...