By Jonathan Ringel | March 24, 2020
Next week's arguments will mark the first time the public can listen to the action without being in the courthouse.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Andrew E. Tomback, Karen Eisenstadt and Julian Canzoneri | March 24, 2020
Much of the post-'Blaszczak' commentary has focused on how eliminating the personal-benefit requirement makes §§1343 and 1348 easier to satisfy than §10(b), and that the government may now shift to relying more on the Title 18 statutes in insider trading prosecutions. This article offers a slightly different view: namely, that with respect to remote tippees, the Title 18 statutes actually create a different hurdle to conviction, one which the logic of 'Blaszczak' actually reinforces.
By Cheryl Miller | March 20, 2020
Merced County Superior Court Judge Carole Ash declared a mistrial and advised everyone in the courtroom to talk to the public health department or a doctor. The court's executive officer released a statement saying the courtroom will be disinfected.
By Suzette Parmley | March 19, 2020
"The trial court erred by admitting both prejudicial testimony" but "the evidence against Trinidad was overwhelming," the Supreme Court's majority said.
By Raychel Lean | March 18, 2020
"Ordinarily, criminals are not so lucky as to receive a reduced sentence for piling on more criminal activity," the Eleventh Circuit ruling said.
Daily Report Online | Letter to the Editor
By Senior Judge Melvin K. Westmoreland, Superior Courts of Georgia | March 18, 2020
"If that type of reasoning prevails, Georgia voters will have lost our constitutional right to vote for judges."
By Ryan Tarinelli | March 17, 2020
A spokesman for the state's highest court said arguments, heard by all seven judges, were not open to public spectators.
By Jonathan Ringel | March 17, 2020
The list includes the four finalists for Justice Robert Benham's seat.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Lynn K. Neuner and William T. Russell Jr. | March 17, 2020
In their New York Court of Appeals Roundup, Lynn K. Neuner and William T. Russell Jr. discuss a recent four-to-three decision in which a narrow majority of the Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's sentencing determination that had been based on information from an unrelated criminal action in which the same defendant had been acquitted of all charges.
By Marcia Coyle | March 16, 2020
"The court will examine the options for rescheduling those cases in due course in light of the developing circumstances," the Supreme Court's press office stated.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Atlantic City, NJ office for a Gaming attorney. The rapidly expanding Gaming Department is...
Yardi is a global software company providing innovative property management solutions and services in every real estate market. We are focus...
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A. is a Boutique Wage and Hour Litigation law firm. Candidates should have 2-3 years litigation experience. The ex...