New York Law Journal | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By E. Leo Milonas and Andrew C. Smith | January 17, 2019
In their Appellate Division Review, E. Leo Milonas and Andrew Smith discuss recent decisions from the Appellate Divisions, including the recent Second Department decision “People ex rel. Wells v. DeMarco,” which held that state and local law enforcement officers lack authority under New York law to effect arrests for violations of federal civil immigration violations.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Jonathan N. Frodella | January 17, 2019
Currently, record custodians bear the full burden of investigation when requestors choose not to provide relevant background information.
By Tom McParland | January 16, 2019
In the rulings, the high court remanded the cases for resentencing, finding that the Superior Court convictions had breached the multiplicity doctrine, which bars the state from dividing one crime into multiple counts by splitting it “into a series of temporal or spatial units.”
By William Stein and Myron Moskovitz | January 15, 2019
Take a few moments to remember these things—before you try your case.
By Marcia Coyle | January 15, 2019
The 5-4 decision Tuesday in Stokeling v. United States reflected an unusual alignment of the justices. In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor was joined by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts Jr.
By Mike Scarcella | January 15, 2019
Assistant Federal Public Defender Brenda Bryn of Fort Lauderdale argued the appeal.
By Mike Scarcella | January 15, 2019
The 5-4 decision Tuesday in Stokeling v. United States reflected an unusual alignment of the justices. In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor was joined by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts Jr.
By Andrew Denney | January 14, 2019
As part of a pilot program that launches Feb. 1, city judges will be required to direct staff to report evidence suppression and issues with police credibility on the stand to court clerks' offices.
By Colby Hamilton | January 14, 2019
A Second Department panel found the former Queens criminal judge had failed to properly handle a 'Batson' challenge by the defense, sending the case back for retrial.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Ellen Murphy, Scott Morvillo, Wendy Butler Curtis and Kelly Cullen | January 14, 2019
While Technology Assisted Review is a common and beneficial tool in civil litigations, it is improper and potentially unconstitutional as the sole arbiter for privilege review in criminal cases, particularly if required by courts.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Atlantic City, NJ office for a Gaming attorney. The rapidly expanding Gaming Department is...
Yardi is a global software company providing innovative property management solutions and services in every real estate market. We are focus...
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A. is a Boutique Wage and Hour Litigation law firm. Candidates should have 2-3 years litigation experience. The ex...