By Marcia Coyle | January 17, 2018
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday grappled with whether a criminal defense lawyer violates the Constitution by ignoring his client's express wishes in order to save him from the death penalty.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Lynn K. Neuner and William T. Russell Jr. | January 16, 2018
In their New York Court of Appeals Roundup, Lynn K. Neuner and William T. Russell Jr. discuss 'People v. Boone', in which the Court of Appeals held that, in a case in which a witness's identification of the defendant is at issue, and the identifying witness and defendant appear to be of different races, a trial court is required to give, upon request, a jury charge on the cross-race effect during final instructions.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Elizabeth S. Kase and Brian T. McCarthy | January 16, 2018
Elizabeth S. Kase and Brian T. McCarthy write: By articulating specific guidelines for trial courts and the potential for sanctions against non-compliant prosecutors, New York is poised to implement sweeping procedural changes in 2018, but will the enumerated changes have true meaningful impact for criminal defendants?
By Katheryn Tucker | January 12, 2018
Retired Supreme Court Chief Justice Hugh Thompson retired a year ago after 47 years in the legal profession, including 45 on the bench serving every kind of court.
By John Council | January 11, 2018
A Dallas state district court judge is pushing back against an appellate court decision that orders her to explain why she is declining to appoint…
By Angela Morris | January 10, 2018
A West Texas lawyer who was convicted of forging a will to steal the estate of a multimillionaire now faces disbarment, while also seeking…
National Law Journal | Commentary
By Tim Lewis | January 9, 2018
On Jan. 17, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in McCoy v. Louisiana, a case that will determine whether the law allows a defense attorney to concede a defendant's guilt to the jury over the defendant's explicit objections.
By Katheryn Tucker | January 8, 2018
“One might wonder why the Court engages in this pointless exercise,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in his dissent. “The only possible explanation is its concern with the 'unusual facts' of this case, specifically a juror affidavit that expresses racist opinions about blacks. The opinions in the affidavit are certainly odious. But their odiousness does not excuse us from doing our job correctly, or allow us to pretend that the lower courts have not done theirs.”
By Katheryn Tucker | January 8, 2018
“Out of an abundance of caution, we are closing non-essential agencies to ensure our employees' safety as well as ensure the Georgia Department of Transportation's ability to maintain and treat our roads,” Gov. Nathan Deal said.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | January 8, 2018
The United States Supreme Court should follow the lead of New Jersey, hold that a subpoena is required, and review the scope of the third-party rule.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...