By Allison Dunn | June 28, 2022
In its first application of the Daubert standard regarding the admissibility of expert testimony, the Maryland Court of Appeals has affirmed that a trial court acted within its discretion to admit a scientist's testimony about the use of photogrammetry to identify a murder suspect's height, despite an unknown degree of uncertainty in the measurements.
By Meghann M. Cuniff | June 27, 2022
Eastman's lawyers on Monday filed an emergency motion in U.S. district court seeking the phone's return.
By Colleen Murphy | June 27, 2022
"To effectively address the existing backlog, it is essential that trial teams be given more realistic trial dates—and that they be able to proceed to trial on those dates," Chief Justice Stuart Rabner wrote.
By Avalon Zoppo | June 27, 2022
Judge Robert Wilkins dissented to the ruling, saying the case should've been sent back to a district court judge to consider additional travel restrictions.
By Harry H. Rimm and Christopher Shields | June 24, 2022
It is time for federal courts to appraise more realistically all consequences that a criminal conviction has on a defendant.
By Robert G. Heim | June 24, 2022
This article provides an introduction to AI technology and discusses the key regulatory developments practitioners should be aware of as they advise their clients on AI.
By Andrew Goudsward | June 23, 2022
Justice Department officials and White House lawyers made a mockery of Jeff Clark's qualifications to be the attorney general, according to testimony before the House Jan. 6 committee.
By Cedra Mayfield | June 23, 2022
"The court determined that there was 'no reasonable probability' of harm, invoking the standard typically applicable to nonconstitutional errors, rather than applying the 'beyond a reasonable doubt' standard that applies to most constitutional errors, including errors arising from juror misconduct," read the Supreme Court of Georgia decision.
By Brian Lee | June 22, 2022
The majority noted "the near absence" of evidence concerning Williams' mental state, a requirement for depraved indifference.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | June 22, 2022
According to a review of the court's output, with nearly the first half of the 2022 over, the high court has issued opinions in 10 cases. Contrast that with the first six months of 2021, when the justices had issued opinions in 44 cases, with only two of those being evenly divided.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Yardi is a global software company providing innovative property management solutions and services in every real estate market. We are focus...
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A. is a Boutique Wage and Hour Litigation law firm. Candidates should have 2-3 years litigation experience. The ex...
McHenry & Horan, P.C. is a legacy medical malpractice defense firm with offices in Uniondale, NY. We are well respected for our expertis...