The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | July 20, 2022
In Pownall, Dougherty saved his "unconstrained" criticism of the office for a separate 19-page concurring opinion, in which he accused prosecutors of manipulating the grand jury process by withholding definitions, unfairly pushing to bypass the preliminary hearing phase and creating delays with excessive appeals.
Connecticut Law Tribune | News
By Allison Dunn | July 19, 2022
"We conclude that the police officers' questioning of the defendant constituted interrogation for the purposes of 'Miranda' because the police officers should have known that their questions reasonably were likely to elicit incriminating statements from the defendant," Judge Eliot D. Prescott wrote on behalf of the appellate court.
By Colleen Murphy | July 18, 2022
In a precedential 169-page opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has upheld the convictions and sentences for two members of the Lucchese organized crime family and two Texas brothers on charges of racketeering and conspiracy.
New York Law Journal | Commentary
By Bennett L. Gershman and Joel Cohen | July 15, 2022
Even with powerful evidence of guilt, prosecutors will face daunting challenges to persuade a jury of Trump's guilt, and then defend that conviction in appellate courtrooms.
By Justin Henry | July 14, 2022
Albin spent two decades on the New Jersey Supreme Court before stepping down earlier this month on hitting the mandatory retirement age.
New York Law Journal | Commentary
By Joseph W. Bellacosa | July 14, 2022
How do "noisy" defects in a trial get air-brushed as "harmless"?
By ALM Staff | July 14, 2022
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By Allison Dunn | July 11, 2022
"Here, the defendant's proffered expert testimony about his mental state was relevant to whether the 'knowingly' element had been met," Associate Justice John Englander wrote. "As the evidence was relevant, and its exclusion was not harmless, we vacate the conviction."
By Marianna Wharry | July 6, 2022
Nearly 50 years after the indictment was first returned in the Massachusetts Superior Court, the state's Court of Appeals has ordered a new trial for a defendant convicted in 1975 of second degree murder and armed assault.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Benjamin Rosenberg | July 5, 2022
Can the court abrogate the employer's privilege over the objection of the employer, and if so under what circumstances? This article discusses two cases in which the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit addressed this question, holding that the court could not abrogate the employer's privilege.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an attorney to work at the level of a mid or senior associate to join its national management-side lab...
We are a busy Central New Jersey Defense Firm specializing in Workers Compensation Law. We service every vicinage within the State of New J...
Legal Administrative Assistant / Junior ParalegalRivkind, Margulies & Rivkind, P.A.Miami, FL, USAEmployment Type: Full-TimeBenefits Offe...