By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | July 21, 2017
Prosecutors Granted Motion to Compel DNA Swabs; Defendants Granted Protective Orders
By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | July 21, 2017
Officers Unaware Plaintiff Lived at Home When They Went in Search of Coplaintiff's Father
By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | July 21, 2017
Supporting Deposition Unnecessary to Convert Complaint Due to Excited Utterance Exception
By Zack Needles | July 21, 2017
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether common-law forfeiture exists in the state, after the Commonwealth Court en banc ruled earlier this year that it does not.
By therecorder | The Recorder | July 21, 2017
C.A. 1st; A148919 The First Appellate District affirmed a trial court order. The court held that the defendant’s convictions for felony access…
By therecorder | The Recorder | July 21, 2017
Cal.Sup.Ct.; S075725 The California Supreme Court affirmed a judgment of conviction and penalty. The court held that any error in the exclusion of testimony…
By Max Mitchell | July 21, 2017
With the First Judicial District's selection of Kelley Hodge as Philadelphia's interim district attorney, many in the criminal defense bar expressed high hopes the veteran prosecutor has the background and temperament to guide the office through a troubled time of transition.
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD | July 21, 2017
Fifty years ago on May 15, the U.S. Supreme Court issued the landmark decision of In Re: Gault. Connecticut's commitment to juvenile justice has given us hope that the legacy of Gault will continue to be honored for another 50 years.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | July 21, 2017
Trial court acted within its permissible discretion in imposing a sentence below the guideline range for appellee's conviction for aggravated harassment by a prisoner, aggravated assault and simple assault because appellee had special mental health problems that would be exacerbated by continued incarceration but were addressable in a probationary setting. Affirmed.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | July 21, 2017
Trial court erred in determining appellant RRRI ineligible for Connecticut conviction for "third-degree assault" where the offense was not an equivalent offense to the Pennsylvania offense of simple assault because the Connecticut offense did not distinguish whether the assault occurred with mutual consent. Conviction affirmed, judgment of sentence reversed, case remanded for resentencing.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Atlantic City, NJ office for a Gaming attorney. The rapidly expanding Gaming Department is...
Yardi is a global software company providing innovative property management solutions and services in every real estate market. We are focus...
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A. is a Boutique Wage and Hour Litigation law firm. Candidates should have 2-3 years litigation experience. The ex...