By therecorder | The Recorder | August 11, 2017
9th Cir.; 16-10160 The court of appeals affirmed a district court order. The court held that relators’ filing of a qui tam action did not give…
By therecorder | The Recorder | August 11, 2017
C.A. 3rd; C078620 The Third Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that even though a human trafficking victim was shielded from prosecution…
By Marcia Coyle | August 11, 2017
Jenner & Block's Matthew Hellman will oppose the government this term in "Marinello v. United States" in which he argues the government is using an "omnibus" clause in the tax code as an "uber tax-crime statute."
By R. Robin McDonald | August 11, 2017
Attorney Stephen Reba found the memo amid a sheaf of loose papers in one of 10 banker boxes left over from the 2007 murder trial of a coastal Georgia physician.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | August 11, 2017
Trial court could not require defendant undergo Court Reporting Network evaluation as a condition of bail, as trial court was statutorily limited to imposing nonmonetary conditions of bail aimed solely at ensuring defendant's continued appearance and preventing violation of standard conditions of bail. Order of the trial court reversed.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | August 11, 2017
A work-release prisoner's failure to go to work after being released to do so and having his whereabouts unknown for a majority of his absence from prison constituted a sufficiently significant deviation from the route of travel to constitute the offense of escape. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | August 11, 2017
Penalty provisions of sex offender registration statute did not violate Ex Post Facto Clause, where defendant had failed to comply with registration requirement after the legislature had already criminalized such failure. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | August 11, 2017
The suppression court appropriately denied defendant's motion to suppress a handgun seized by police from a public bathroom in a barbershop where defendant worked since he failed to establish a subjective expectation of privacy such that the warrantless police entry implicated his own personal privacy rights. The court affirmed defendant's judgment of sentence.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | August 11, 2017
The Post Conviction Relief Act court appropriately granted defendant a preclusion order since the private interview prosecutors sought with defendant's trial counsel could easily have become a freewheeling inquiry into privileged matters falling outside the scope of defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The court affirmed an order of preclusion.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | August 11, 2017
Evidence of refusal of blood alcohol test properly excluded where commonwealth permitted to submit other evidence of defendant's reckless driving, including his consumption of alcohol, high rate of speed, and failure to stop at a red light, as evidence of refusal of test presented risk of unfair prejudice or confusion of issues. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Title: Legal Counsel Reports to: Chief Executive Officer (CEO) FLSA Status: Exempt, Full Time Supervisory Responsibility: N/A Location: Remo...
Blume Forte Fried Zerres and Molinari 1 Main Street Chatham, NJ 07945Prominent Morris County Law Firm with a state-wide personal injury prac...
d Arcambal Ousley & Cuyler Burk, LLP, a well-established women-owned litigation firm, has an opening in our Parsippany, NJ office. We of...