Lawyers Should Take No Part in Delegitimizing Our Courts
Courts should discipline lawyers who assert intentional falsehoods that undermine public trust in the legitimacy of the judiciary.$8.5 Million Settlement Reached in Wrongful-Death Case
"There's always mixed emotions when you're dealing with a large settlement that's on account of a tragedy," Chris Parkin said. "Our client is able to close this awful chapter of her life, and move forward with her son."Record Labels: Generative AI Has Wrought 'Infringement on an Almost Unimaginable Scale'
The lawsuits are believed to be the first in which music companies have sued AI companies for actual songs, as opposed to written lyrics.4 Opinions, 1 Case: Discovery Issue Deeply Divides Justices
In addition to the majority's 5-2 opinion, there was a concurrence, a concurrence and dissent, and a dissent.Where Do Law Grads Get the Most Bang for Their Buck?
A newly released report analyzes where law school graduates get the best return on their investment.'Brazen Legal Fiction': Smartmatic Asks Court to Reject Fox's Defenses in Defamation Case
"Fox's affirmative defenses are a parade of legal jargon divorced from facts and applicable law," Smartmatic counsel from Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff argue in the latest motion sequence.'End of the Road'? SCOTUS Won't Hear Challenge to Connecticut Vaccine Law
"It is a classic battle of church vs. state," said Brian Festa, vice president and co-founder of We The Patriots USA, one of the plaintiffs.Justices Will Consider Scope of Corporate Remedies for Trademark Infringement
The Supreme Court agreed to resolve "[w]hether an award of the 'defendant's profits' under the Lanham Act ... can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates."Arbitration Analysis: Decision to Rehire After an Armed Standoff
Reinstatement without any penalty or limitations was a violation of public policy.Supreme Court Agrees to Review Constitutionality of Tennessee's Ban on Trans Care for Minors
A key dispute in the case is what level of constitutional scrutiny to apply to the state's law: a rigorous form known as "heightened scrutiny" or a more lenient type of "rational-basis" review. The circuit court applied the latter and found that the state could rationally concluded that SB1 was an appropriate response to risks from puberty blockers and hormone therapy.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
6 Essential Questions Benefits Advisors Should Ask When Tailoring Pharmacy Benefits
Brought to you by RxBenefits
Download Now
7 Ways to Take Your Practice to the Next Level
Brought to you by Mariner
Download Now
7 Ways to Take Your Practice to the Next Level
Brought to you by Mariner
Download Now
Why Embracing Change Is Essential for Your Legal Department
Brought to you by DiliTrust
Download Now