Clothing Retailer Chico's Secures $200 Million Thanks to Greenberg Traurig
This is the first corporate financing transaction the law firm has done for Chico's FAS, owner of the Chico's, White House Black Market and Soma brands.
September 11, 2018 at 02:13 PM
4 minute read
A Miami-based Greenberg Traurig duo led a legal team that secured $200 million for women's clothing retailer Chico's FAS Inc.
This is the first corporate financing deal Greenberg Traurig has done for the Fort Myers-based publicly traded company, whose brands are Chico's, White House Black Market and Soma.
“This was a significant expansion of our relationship with them,” said Randy Bullard, one of the Miami shareholders who led the deal.
Bullard worked with shareholder Juan Delgado, corporate associates Stephen Pelliccia and Alexander Iparraguirre, all in Miami, as well as tax shareholder Kevin Zaragoza in New York on the deal that closed Aug. 2.
This was a U.S. asset-based credit facility secured from lead lender Wells Fargo & Co. The other lenders were Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The financing was leveraged against Chico's FAS assets from U.S. stores to inventory but excluding foreign inventory, stores, intellectual property and other assets.
“An asset-based loan permits you to borrow a specific amount based upon what's called a borrowing base,” Bullard said. “That's a calculation based upon how much inventory you have, the value of your credit card receivables and the value of your in-transit inventory, meaning inventory that's on the way to your warehouse.”
Issues might arise during negotiations between borrower and lender on how asset values are calculated.
“There are many different types of nuances in how those calculations are made,” Bullard said. “So the tension between the borrower and the lender is how do you calculate, obviously on the borrower's behalf, to get as much availability as possible with the lender being comfortable that it has adequate protection and an adequate security interest in those assets. The essence of the negotiation between the parties is the calculation of this formula of borrowing base availability.”
This deal came with another challenge for the legal team — a tight timeline.
“Since they are a public reporting company, they wanted to refinance prior to the end of their fiscal quarter. And their fiscal quarter ended on Aug. 3. So it was critical to have the new financing in place by Aug. 2,” Bullard said. “It took a lot of planning, a lot of negotiations with the lender to make sure everything was done to meet that timeline.”
Chico's FAS opted to borrow in part to refinance an existing loan on better terms, including a lower interest rate. The credit facility has an interest rate of 1.25 percent above Libor, Bullard said.
Proceeds also will help pay for day-to-day business operations, basically “whatever they decide to do,” Bullard said.
Because this was asset-backed credit, it gives the company more wiggle room when it comes to reporting to the lenders.
“There were many fewer restrictions on the operations of the company, what the company could do with their free cash flow, for example,” Bullard said. “Fewer reporting requirements that they needed to make to the bank so they had greater flexibility to operate the company without having to seek bank consent or bank approval or making various reports to the lenders. It allows them to have the flexibility to borrow funds from those lenders without having to pay a higher interest rate or report on a quarterly basis a lot of different financial metrics of the company.”
Chico's FAS still must issue reports to its shareholders and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Bullard noted.
Greenberg Traurig has represented Chico's FAS in matters other than corporate financing since 2013.
Chico's FAS has 1,451 stores in the U.S. and Canada and 94 franchise locations in Mexico.
Otterbourg finance group co-chairman David Morse and attorneys David Impastato and Allen Cremer, all in New York, represented the lender.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Developer Drops Claims of Misappropriating Trade Secrets and Stealing Key Employees
5 minute read'Be Proactive With Clients': Florida's New Condo Regulations Will Require a Closer Look at Contracts
5 minute readReal Estate Transactions: Nelson Mullins Says Trust Is Key to Display Good Judgment
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Zero-Dollar Verdict: Which of Florida's Largest Firms Lost?
- 2Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
- 3SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
- 4Judiciary Law §487 in 2024
- 5Polsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250