Big Law Partner Saves the Music by Relocating Iconic Miami Festival
Miguel De Grandy, a land-use attorney in Holland & Knight's Miami office, argued before Miami city commissioners on Thursday to secure Ultra Music Festival's move to Miami Marine Stadium and Virginia Key Beach Park in March 2019. The festival had been held in Bayfront Park since 2012.
November 20, 2018 at 04:45 PM
5 minute read
For a while it didn't seem as though Ultra Music Festival would close 2018 on a harmonious note. Mired in trademark litigation, the Miami staple and internationally adored electronic music festival was booted from its longtime home of Bayfront Park during a contentious Sept. 27 Miami City Commission meeting.
But with the help of land-use attorney Miguel De Grandy, the festival's future is not only looking brighter, but more scenic as well.
On Thursday, De Grandy secured four out of five votes from Miami city commissioners approving Ultra Music Festival's bid to host the event at Virginia Key on March 29-31, 2019. Under the new agreement, organizers of the centerpiece of Miami Music Week will pay the city $2 million for the use of Miami Marine Stadium and Historic Virginia Key Beach Park to accommodate its infamously lavish stages.
“The majority of the activity will be on the Miami Marine parcel,” De Grandy told the Daily Business Review. “The other 20 to 25 percent will be in the Historic Virginia Key Beach area.”
Despite being retained less than two weeks before the hearing, De Grandy was quickly brought up to speed. The attorney, a partner with Miami's Holland & Knight office, had to navigate a number of challenges and concerns over his client's prospective move.
Foremost among them was the presence of another event, Rapture Electronic Music Festival, on the same grounds and on the same dates sought by Ultra.
De Grandy disputed Rapture's claim that a contract had already been signed with Miami for its 2019 edition.
“We were surprised by Rapture's claim because we were unable to find any actually executed contract,” De Grandy said. “We monitor City of Miami Commission meetings and we know [Rapture representatives] haven't been to meetings like we have.”
Significant objections against Ultra's move were also raised by Key Biscayne residents, who mounted a movement against the festival, according to Miami New Times.
“It's unfortunate that they engaged in a campaign of deceptive advertising,” De Grandy said when asked about their efforts. He added that Ultra Music Festival has had no major incidents since 2015 and carries a zero-tolerance substance policy aided in part by its “amnesty box” program for illegal drugs.
“One thing I've learned in the 37 years of practicing law is you don't engage in deceptive practices if the law is on your side,” De Grandy quipped.
Read the agreement between Ultra Music Festival and the City of Miami here:
And now, organizers will spend considerable resources to address traffic fallout, their attorney said.
“We're going to do everything possible to minimize the transportation impact,” De Grandy said, acknowledging that unlike Bayfront Park, Virginia Key is traditionally only accessible by one route: the Rickenbacker Causeway.
“Contrast to the staging at Bayfront Park, where we didn't spend a penny on transportation, we're going to be spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on a transportation plan,” De Grandy said. He added his client is currently identifying parking options as well as the possibility of arranging buses, ferries and water taxis to transport festival attendees to their destination.
Speaking on the environmental concerns, De Grandy said the beach of Historic Virginia Key Beach Park will be closed off using concrete barriers as well as 10- to 12-foot fencing. And to control the noise, the decibel levels will not differ from what Rapture would have offered.
The agreement between Ultra and Miami to host the festival at Virginia Key is a five-year revocable license. It stipulates that should the city decide to terminate the agreement, it must give notice at least 364 days before the next scheduled iteration.
Reflecting on the possibility of further haggling over Ultra's next location, De Grandy said “whether someone wants to take legal action or not is their prerogative.”
“The city … made it very clear to the city manager that they were [willing] to sit down, meet with Rapture and accommodate different dates to stage their event,” he said in response to the prospect of making arrangements with their newfound competitors. “I think that'd be the best of both worlds. Both can co-exist happily, peacefully and musically.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250