Court Enters Judgment Against GEICO in Consumer Class Action
Motorists whose vehicles were declared a total loss by Geico won an order covering payment of title fees and license plate transfer fees.
July 26, 2019 at 05:02 PM
3 minute read
An Orlando federal magistrate granted summary judgment to five plaintiffs in a class action against an Geico and awarded damages to each class member.
Ashley Barrett, Micah Bellamy, Anthony Cook, Maurice Jones and Anthony Lorenti filed a breach of contract lawsuit on behalf of themselves and a proposed class against the Government Employees Insurance Co. and Geico General Insurance Co.
Each named plaintiff was insured by a GEICO Form A30-FL (03-11) policy when their vehicles were involved in an accident. Each plaintiff submitted claims to GEICO, and their vehicles were declared a total loss.
During the time period, GEICO had a uniform policy of not paying title fees or license plate transfer fees in Florida total loss claim settlements. Each of the claims against GEICO stemmed from total loss claims settled by GEICO that did not include compensation for title or license plate transfer fees.
The plaintiffs contended GEICO breached its contracts with them and the class by failing to pay title fees or license plate transfer fees as part of actual cash value payments after total losses.
The parties moved for summary judgment.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, concluding the policy required GEICO to pay title fees and license plate transfer fees as components of loss in the event of a total loss.
In its decision, the court explained the policy limited GEICO's loss liability to “actual cash value,” defined as “the replacement cost of the [insured vehicle] less depreciation or betterment.”
The court then ruled title transfer fees were a component of actual cash value, reasoning title transfer fees were costs an insured was “reasonably likely to incur” in replacing his or her vehicle.
The court next decided license plate transfer fees also were included in actual cash value, noting they had to be paid within 30 days of the purchase of a replacement vehicle and rejecting GEICO's argument that transfer fees were not part of replacement cost because the fees were incurred after purchasing a replacement vehicle.
The court concluded GEICO materially breached its contracts with the plaintiffs by failing to include these fees in total loss claim settlements. It awarded each of the named plaintiffs damages in the amount of $79.35 and ruled class members also were entitled to $79.35 each.
The case is Jones v. Government Employees Insurance, Nos: 6:17-cv-891-Orl-40LRH, 6:17-cv-1755-Orl-40LRH (M.D. Fla. July 19. Attorneys involved include: For plaintiffs (6:17cv891): Bradley W. Pratt, lead attorney, Pratt Clay, Atlanta; Christopher B. Hall, Hall & Lampros, Atlanta; Christopher J. Lynch, Christopher J. Lynch P.A., South Miami; Edmund A. Normand, Normand Law, Orlando; Tracy Lynne Markham, Avolio & Hanlon, St. Augustine; Jacob Lawrence Phillips, Normand, Orlando. For defendants Alexander Fuchs and Kymberly Kochis, Eversheds Sutherland, New York; Amelia Toy Rudolph, Eversheds Sutherland, Atlanta; Susan Banks Harwood, Kaplan Zeena, Miami
Steven A. Meyerowitz, a Harvard Law School graduate, is the founder and president of Meyerowitz Communications Inc., a law firm marketing communications consulting company. Meyerowitz is the Director of the Insurance Coverage Law Center and editor-in-chief of journals on insurance law, banking law, bankruptcy law, energy law, government contracting law, and privacy and cybersecurity law, among other subjects. Contact him at smeyerowitz@
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250