Court Enters Judgment Against GEICO in Consumer Class Action
Motorists whose vehicles were declared a total loss by Geico won an order covering payment of title fees and license plate transfer fees.
July 26, 2019 at 05:02 PM
3 minute read
An Orlando federal magistrate granted summary judgment to five plaintiffs in a class action against an Geico and awarded damages to each class member.
Ashley Barrett, Micah Bellamy, Anthony Cook, Maurice Jones and Anthony Lorenti filed a breach of contract lawsuit on behalf of themselves and a proposed class against the Government Employees Insurance Co. and Geico General Insurance Co.
Each named plaintiff was insured by a GEICO Form A30-FL (03-11) policy when their vehicles were involved in an accident. Each plaintiff submitted claims to GEICO, and their vehicles were declared a total loss.
During the time period, GEICO had a uniform policy of not paying title fees or license plate transfer fees in Florida total loss claim settlements. Each of the claims against GEICO stemmed from total loss claims settled by GEICO that did not include compensation for title or license plate transfer fees.
The plaintiffs contended GEICO breached its contracts with them and the class by failing to pay title fees or license plate transfer fees as part of actual cash value payments after total losses.
The parties moved for summary judgment.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, concluding the policy required GEICO to pay title fees and license plate transfer fees as components of loss in the event of a total loss.
In its decision, the court explained the policy limited GEICO's loss liability to “actual cash value,” defined as “the replacement cost of the [insured vehicle] less depreciation or betterment.”
The court then ruled title transfer fees were a component of actual cash value, reasoning title transfer fees were costs an insured was “reasonably likely to incur” in replacing his or her vehicle.
The court next decided license plate transfer fees also were included in actual cash value, noting they had to be paid within 30 days of the purchase of a replacement vehicle and rejecting GEICO's argument that transfer fees were not part of replacement cost because the fees were incurred after purchasing a replacement vehicle.
The court concluded GEICO materially breached its contracts with the plaintiffs by failing to include these fees in total loss claim settlements. It awarded each of the named plaintiffs damages in the amount of $79.35 and ruled class members also were entitled to $79.35 each.
The case is Jones v. Government Employees Insurance, Nos: 6:17-cv-891-Orl-40LRH, 6:17-cv-1755-Orl-40LRH (M.D. Fla. July 19. Attorneys involved include: For plaintiffs (6:17cv891): Bradley W. Pratt, lead attorney, Pratt Clay, Atlanta; Christopher B. Hall, Hall & Lampros, Atlanta; Christopher J. Lynch, Christopher J. Lynch P.A., South Miami; Edmund A. Normand, Normand Law, Orlando; Tracy Lynne Markham, Avolio & Hanlon, St. Augustine; Jacob Lawrence Phillips, Normand, Orlando. For defendants Alexander Fuchs and Kymberly Kochis, Eversheds Sutherland, New York; Amelia Toy Rudolph, Eversheds Sutherland, Atlanta; Susan Banks Harwood, Kaplan Zeena, Miami
Steven A. Meyerowitz, a Harvard Law School graduate, is the founder and president of Meyerowitz Communications Inc., a law firm marketing communications consulting company. Meyerowitz is the Director of the Insurance Coverage Law Center and editor-in-chief of journals on insurance law, banking law, bankruptcy law, energy law, government contracting law, and privacy and cybersecurity law, among other subjects. Contact him at smeyerowitz@
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250