Miami Lawsuit Alleges Geico Dodges Legitimate No-Fault PIP Claims
Florida's personal injury protection statute provides coverage to all drivers injured in a crash, regardless of who was to blame.
April 07, 2020 at 01:36 PM
3 minute read
GEICO insurance office. Photo: Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock.com.
A dispute over insurance coverage for post-car crash physical therapy is playing out in Miami-Dade Circuit Court, where a medical center has accused Maryland-based Geico General Insurance Co. of systematically refusing to cover legitimate personal injury protection claims.
Miami Greenberg Traurig attorney Stephanie Peral represents plaintiff Florida Spine and Joint Institute in Coral Springs, which says it was stonewalled after patients assigned their policy benefits to the center, which sought reimbursement for PIP benefits.
Florida's PIP statute, also known as "no-fault car insurance," provides coverage to all drivers injured in a crash, regardless of who was to blame.
But the no-fault system is on shaky ground. The Florida House of Representatives is poised to vote on a proposal, HB 771, which seeks a repeal over allegations that increased fraud has caused insurance rates to rise.
Related story: No-Fault Auto Insurance Repeal on Road to Florida House Floor
The plaintiff alleges Geico used its denial letters as a negotiating tactic, aimed at lowering costs or avoiding the claims outright. The insurer is accused of defaming Florida Spine and Joint Institute by writing to its patients to say it suspected the center had fraudulently billed them, without providing any evidence.
"Geico has a reasonable belief that a fraudulent insurance act under Sections 626.989 or 817.234, Fla. Stat., has been committed with respect to the claim," one of the letters read. "Geico is therefore investigating the claim for suspected fraud. Accordingly, no payment will be issued on the claim at this time pursuant to Section 627.736(4)(i), Fla. Stat."
The complaint says Geico gave multiple unsubstantiated reasons for denying coverage, including allegations that the center had charged too much, that its medical directors weren't properly fulfilling their duties or that the company's billing time codes didn't match its hours of operation.
According to the lawsuit, Geico did offer to pay the claims if the medical center waived any interest.
Geico did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
CEO of Florida Spine and Joint Institute Ryan Fulcher said his company "will not allow Geico to interfere with important and necessary medical care" for its patients.
"We hope this lawsuit will quickly result in Geico finally providing its policyholders with the insurance benefits they were promised," Fulcher said in an email.
The complaint accuses the defendant of tortious interference and defamation, and seeks a declaratory judgment forcing Geico to pay for the denied claims.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas will preside over the case.
Read the complaint:
Read more:
Practical Business and Insurance Considerations for Hotels, Restaurants During COVID-19 Crisis
No-Fault Auto Insurance Repeal on Road to Florida House Floor
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailybusinessreview/contrib/content/uploads/sites/414/2024/08/International-View.jpeg-image767x633cropped.jpg)
Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules
![New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/98/ca/4dd6a947421bbc9c53aad7b8dd51/allstate-insurance-2-767x633.jpg)
![Once the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years Once the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/6f/fc/9377412b47f38f5cdbdf7ce78e87/class-action-firefighters-767x633.jpg)
Once the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute read![Attorneys, Health Care Officials Face Nearly $80M RICO Suit Over Allegedly Fabricated Spreadsheet Attorneys, Health Care Officials Face Nearly $80M RICO Suit Over Allegedly Fabricated Spreadsheet](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailybusinessreview/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/04/corruption-bribery-767x633.jpg)
Attorneys, Health Care Officials Face Nearly $80M RICO Suit Over Allegedly Fabricated Spreadsheet
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The End of Innocence? DEP’s End Run Around ‘All Appropriate Inquiry’ Spill Act Protections
- 2Pistachio Giant Wonderful Files Trademark Suit Against Canadian Maker of Wonderspread
- 3New York State Authorizes Stand-Alone Business Interruption Insurance Policies
- 4Buyer Beware: Continuity of Coverage in Legal Malpractice Insurance
- 5‘Listen, Listen, Listen’: Some Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250