Miami Lawsuit Alleges Geico Dodges Legitimate No-Fault PIP Claims
Florida's personal injury protection statute provides coverage to all drivers injured in a crash, regardless of who was to blame.
April 07, 2020 at 01:36 PM
3 minute read
A dispute over insurance coverage for post-car crash physical therapy is playing out in Miami-Dade Circuit Court, where a medical center has accused Maryland-based Geico General Insurance Co. of systematically refusing to cover legitimate personal injury protection claims.
Miami Greenberg Traurig attorney Stephanie Peral represents plaintiff Florida Spine and Joint Institute in Coral Springs, which says it was stonewalled after patients assigned their policy benefits to the center, which sought reimbursement for PIP benefits.
Florida's PIP statute, also known as "no-fault car insurance," provides coverage to all drivers injured in a crash, regardless of who was to blame.
But the no-fault system is on shaky ground. The Florida House of Representatives is poised to vote on a proposal, HB 771, which seeks a repeal over allegations that increased fraud has caused insurance rates to rise.
|
Related story: No-Fault Auto Insurance Repeal on Road to Florida House Floor
The plaintiff alleges Geico used its denial letters as a negotiating tactic, aimed at lowering costs or avoiding the claims outright. The insurer is accused of defaming Florida Spine and Joint Institute by writing to its patients to say it suspected the center had fraudulently billed them, without providing any evidence.
"Geico has a reasonable belief that a fraudulent insurance act under Sections 626.989 or 817.234, Fla. Stat., has been committed with respect to the claim," one of the letters read. "Geico is therefore investigating the claim for suspected fraud. Accordingly, no payment will be issued on the claim at this time pursuant to Section 627.736(4)(i), Fla. Stat."
The complaint says Geico gave multiple unsubstantiated reasons for denying coverage, including allegations that the center had charged too much, that its medical directors weren't properly fulfilling their duties or that the company's billing time codes didn't match its hours of operation.
According to the lawsuit, Geico did offer to pay the claims if the medical center waived any interest.
Geico did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
CEO of Florida Spine and Joint Institute Ryan Fulcher said his company "will not allow Geico to interfere with important and necessary medical care" for its patients.
"We hope this lawsuit will quickly result in Geico finally providing its policyholders with the insurance benefits they were promised," Fulcher said in an email.
The complaint accuses the defendant of tortious interference and defamation, and seeks a declaratory judgment forcing Geico to pay for the denied claims.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas will preside over the case.
|Read the complaint:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readBack-To-Back Hurricanes' Impact on Florida Legal Work Will Go Beyond Usual Suspects
5 minute readHolland & Knight Snags 2 Insurance Partners in New York and Philadelphia From Goodwin
3 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'America's Next Top Model' Contestant Says Ye Assaulted Her
- 2LexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
- 3'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
- 4Baker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
- 5PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250