Google, Apple Say Their Apps Help With COVID-19 Contact Tracing. Lawyers Weigh In
Whether COVID-19 will change how nations view privacy concerns remains to be seen.
April 15, 2020 at 02:53 PM
4 minute read
Technology giants Apple and Google want to deploy contact-tracing technology to alert mobile users who have made contact with people who've tested positive for the coronavirus.
But one South Florida lawyer says this development could be the start of a "troublesome" trend.
As the country is in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, the benefits of using such software outweighs the privacy concerns, said Luis Salazar, founding attorney of Salazar Law. But there is a risk that the technology developed by the multinational companies could be expanded to other uses, including by organizations seeking to ensure the safety of their employees.
The software would rely upon contact-tracing tools that use existing Bluetooth technology. It will alert a user if he or she comes within a certain distance of another person who has tested positive for the coronavirus. For the tool to work, infected users must disclose their health status. Then, two weeks' worth of the person's contacts with other users would be uploaded to a serve, according to Apple and Google materials. The tool does not transmit the identity of the person who tested positive, so neither users, nor Apple or Google would know.
But attorneys say there could be flaws in the software, such as false positives that can result from inaccurate contact data. For example, a user could be in their own vehicle at a drive-in movie theater, and a second user who tested positive for COVID-19 could be parked next to the first user. But, if neither one of them exited their vehicles or opened a window, then the contact information would be faulty.
"There are not just false positives, but could it be maliciously used or could there be straight out false reporting of some kind to trigger this in the ways of terror concerns?" Salazar said. "The system seems to mitigate it. The way it is designed, it doesn't seem to be actionable because the recipient of the notice is anonymous."
Notifying other people using contact tracing technology is not new, says John E. Clabby, a shareholder in Carlton Fields's Tampa office. He suggested that this is just a more sophisticated use of contact tracing. When Clabby thinks about contact tracing, the United States privacy laws about geolocation data come to mind.
"But there are ways to design to apps that geolocation data is collected and not retained," Clabby said. "And that may be a path to get these contact tracing programs up and running in the United States and Europe."
Whether COVID-19 will change the way in which the U.S. and Europe view privacy concerns remains to be seen. Clabby says the key to the technology is to have it be voluntary, such as how Apple and Google are setting up their software.
Clabby also observed that to be successful, the technology needs to be decentralized. If it is involuntary and centralized, software developers will likely have a harder time convincing American businesses to embrace the technology, he said. Instead, organizations that seek to adopt the technology may have to include a consent feature to avoid litigation.
"A company with large warehouses could adopt it for its employees, and it could get consent from those employees or operate in a state where it's not required," Clabby said. "That would help a company monitor the spread of COVID-19 and potentially help keep manufacturing plants open. Keep essential services open, and otherwise provide primary services."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All11th Circ.: Contempt Conviction Against Nonparty Requires Proof of Aiding and Abetting Bound Party
St. Thomas University Renames Law School After Civil Rights Attorney Ben Crump
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250