Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
366 results for '* topic:"Bankruptcy"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-08-23
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Crain Martin, Matthew S. Sama, DLA Piper LLP (US), Wilmington, DE; Brett Ingerman, DLA Piper LLP (US), Baltimore, MD; Rachel Ehrlich Albanese, DLA Piper LLP (US), New York, NY for appellant.
for defendant: Robert S. Chapman, Sauer & Wagner LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Adam G. Landis, Kerri K. Mumford, Landis Rath & Cobb LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellee.
Case Number: D69931
Bankruptcy court correctly interpreted asset purchase agreement as entitling affiliate to payment on his participation interest where APA expressly identified the interest as a permitted lien that purchaser remained subject to, and thus the broader, general exclusion of obligations to debtor's affiliates did not control.
Publication Date: 2022-08-16
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Judge: Judge Owens
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D69925
State law avoidance claims were timely where bankruptcy code could override statute of repose and permit the filing of the claim if it was timely upon the filing of the bankruptcy petition.
Publication Date: 2022-08-09
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry:
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Judge: Judge Goldblatt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D69912
Corporate waste and fraud adversary claims against directors and officers dismissed where less-than-diligent collection of accounts receivable failed to rise to the level of waste and where debtors were more properly characterized as the perpetrators of the alleged fraud rather than the victims of said fraud.
Publication Date: 2022-08-09
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Energy | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jennifer Selendy, Andrew R. Dunlap, Oscar Shine, Max H. Siegel, Selendy Gay Elsberg PLLC, New York, NY; Laura Davis Jones, Timothy P. Cairns, Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellants.
for defendant: James R. Prince, Kevin Chiu, Baker Botts LLP, Dallas, TX; Scott R. Bowling, Baker Botts LLP, New York, NY; David R. Eastlake, Lauren N. Randle, Baker Botts LLP, Houston, TX; Robert J. Dehney, Curtis S. Miller, Daniel B. Butz, Matthew 0. Talmo, Brian Loughnane, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kristopher M. Hansen, Kenneth Pasquale, Jonathan D. Canfield, Paul Hastings LLP, New York, NY; Matthew B. Lunn, Robert F. Poppiti, Jr., Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP for appellees.
Case Number: D69911
Emergency stay of bankruptcy court's adverse grant of judgment in adversary proceeding denied where appellants were unlikely to prevail on the merits of their appeal and where harm to Chapter 11 debtor outweighed the harm that might come from the reduction of appellants' claims.
Publication Date: 2022-08-09
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Consulting
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Judge: Judge Goldblatt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D69914
Although bankruptcy court resolved dispute regarding the enforceability of judgment creditors' claims where the underlying judgments had not been stayed and were therefore enforceable, the judgment creditors' elected Chapter 7 trustee was rejected for failing to meet the geographical requirements of §321 of the bankruptcy code.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2022-08-02
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Construction | Manufacturing | Mining and Resources
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Garvan F. McDaniel, Daniel K. Hogan, Hogan McDaniel, Wilmington, DE; Stephen W. Tountas, Robert W. Novick, Melissa Barahona, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Mark E. Felger, Simon E. Fraser, Cozen O’Connor, Wilmington, DE; Karen M. Grivner, Clark Hill PLC, Wilmington, DE; Scott N. Schreiber, Michael P. Croghan, Clark Hill PLC, Chicago, IL for defendants.
Case Number: D69909
Motion for leave to appeal bankruptcy court's ruling on the applicable statute of limitations denied where resolution of the issue would not exclude most, if any, of the litigation trustee's fiduciary claims against defendants, and therefore would not materially advance the litigation.
Publication Date: 2022-07-26
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Laura Davis Jones, David M. Bertenthal, Peter J. Keane, Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, Wilmington, DE; Patricia L. Glaser, Gali Grant, Matthew P. Bernstein, Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP, Los Angeles, CA for appellants.
for defendant: Seth A. Niederman, Fox Rothschild LLP, Wilmington, DE; Gregory P. Joseph, Douglas J. Pepe, Gila S. Singer, Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC, New York, NY; Jeffrey H. Zaiger, Judd A. Lindenfeld, Zaiger LLC, Stamford, CT for appellee.
Case Number: D69895
District court accepted bankruptcy court's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-core breach of contract claim where defendant failed to cite evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact as to each of defendant's alleged breaches of a first lien credit agreement, including with respect to the measure of damages.
Publication Date: 2022-07-19
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Judge: Judge Goldblatt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D69889
Court declined to read anti-subordination clause into note agreement where the agreement permitted a supermajority of holders to release the collateral securing the note, since releasing collateral would be a much greater intrusion into noteholders' rights than subordination.
Publication Date: 2022-07-05
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Energy | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Judge: Judge Sontchi
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; J. Christopher Shore, White & Case LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Robert J. Deheny, Curtis S. Miller, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Corey D. Berman, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Miami, FL; John J. Kuster, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY; Matthew McGuire, Landis Rath & Cobb LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jeffrey A. Rosenthal, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D69876
Court denied parties' cross-motions on fraudulent transfer and alter ego claims where there were genuine issues of material fact regarding whether transfers could fall under definition of fraudulent transfers and whether transfers were undertaken for legitimate purposes.
Publication Date: 2022-07-05
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Retail
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Ambro
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D69874
Adversary complaint by class of judgment creditors to equitably subordinate secured claim of debtors' parent company dismissed where class failed to allege facts permitting a reasonable inference of inequitable conduct on the part of the parent.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read