• State of Delaware v. Reed

    Publication Date: 2020-06-17
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Karsnitz
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Caroline Brittingham and Nichole Gannett, Dep’t of Justice, Georgetown, DE for the state.
    for defendant: N/A

    Case Number: D69019

    The court denied defendant's motions to withdraw his guilty plea and for post-conviction relief, because his sentence was just under the circumstances.

  • Chavis v. State

    Publication Date: 2020-06-10
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Vaughn
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bernard J. O’Donnell, Assistant Public Defender, Wilmington, DE for appellant.
    for defendant: Kathryn J. Garrison, Deputy Attorney General, Dover, DE for appellee.

    Case Number: D69008

    Trial court erred in admitting evidence of prior convictions where admission was based solely on second-hand knowledge of the underlying facts of those prior cases and their supposed similarity to the facts of the present case.

  • United States v. Sanchez

    Publication Date: 2020-05-27
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jesse S. Wenger, Assistant United States Attorney, Wilmington, DE for the government.
    for defendant: Mark S. Greenberg, Blue Bell, PA for defendant.

    Case Number: D68996

    The court denied defendant's motion to suppress, because police had found a handgun in defendant's ve-hicle pursuant to a valid traffic stop.

  • State of Delaware v. Henry

    Publication Date: 2020-05-13
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Clark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christel Duff, Dep’t of Justice, Dover, DE for the state.
    for defendant: Ronnier Henry, Seaford, DE, pro se defendant.

    Case Number: D68981

    The trial court improperly granted a motion to suppress, because an on-duty paramedic was a government actor and he had probable cause to detain defendant. Reversed and remanded.

  • Cooper v. State

    Publication Date: 2020-04-29
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Vaughn
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James F. Brose, The Brose Law Firm, Media, PA; Stephanie Volturo and Jan A. T. van Amerongen, Jr., Office of Conflicts Counsel, Wilmington, DE for appellant.
    for defendant: Sean P. Lugg, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for appellee.

    Case Number: D68959

    Confidential informant testimony and controlled buys corroborated by independent police surveillance were sufficient to establish a nexus in a search warrant application between defendant's residences and business location and the evidence of drugs and weapons sought by police.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Delaware County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Wiggins v. State of Delaware

    Publication Date: 2020-04-22
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Montgomery-Reeves
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nicole M. Walker, Office of the Public Defender, Wilmington, DE for Wiggins.
    for defendant: Matthew C. Bloom , Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for the state.

    Case Number: D68957

    The court vacated a felony drug conviction and remanded for sentencing for a lesser-included misdemeanor, because the state failed to meet its burden of proving that the contents of a vial constituted a "mixture" under Delaware's Controlled Substances Act.

  • Chavis v. State

    Publication Date: 2020-04-22
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Traynor
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nichole M. Walker, John K. Kirk, and Lisa M. Schwind, Wilmington, DE for appellant.
    for defendant: Brian L. Arban, Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for appellee.

    Case Number: D68950

    Use of lab analysts' reports by testifying analyst who also participated in DNA profile matching did not violate defendant's Confrontation Clause rights where reports were non-testimonial because they did not substitute for testimony that would be used to prove an essential element of the crime.

  • United States v. Alexander

    Publication Date: 2020-04-01
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jennifer K. Welch and Carly A. Hudson, Assistant U. S. Attorneys for the government.
    for defendant: Anthony J. Petron, Law Offices of Anthony J. Petron, Philadelphia, PA; Gary S. Silver, Silver Legal Services, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.

    Case Number: D68933

    The court denied a motion to suppress physical evidence because law enforcement officials acted reasonably under the circum-stances. Defendant voluntarily made a pre-arrest statement to police, and he waived his rights prior to giving a recorded state-ment.

  • State of Delaware v. Smith

    Publication Date: 2020-04-01
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Rocanelli
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Amanda J. DiLiberto, Deputy Attorney General, Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for the state.
    for defendant: Natalie S. Woloshin, Woloshin, Lynch & Assoc., P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: D68932

    Defendant was not entitled to post-conviction relief, because trial counsel did not act improperly in cross-examining a witness instead of moving to strike, requesting a curative instruction, or moving for a mistrial.

  • Cruz v. Jurden

    Publication Date: 2020-03-25
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: D68919

    Inmate's complaint to overturn state court's decision denying motion to correct sentence was barred pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.