• Gray v. Allen Harim Foods, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-08-20
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Food and Beverage | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Slomsky
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-1172

    Former employee adequately pled constructive discharge claim by alleging that she was forced to accept transfer to a position that effectively constituted a demotion and train her replacement who was hired while she was on Family and Medical Leave Act leave, which constituted sufficiently intolerable working conditions that would cause a reasonable person to resign.

  • Mitchell Partners, L.P. v. AMFI Corp.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-20
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor McCormick
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Bruce McNew, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Lisa M. Zwally, Bryan T. Reed, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: 2020-0985-KSJM ("AMFI I")

    Court denied reargument of decision finding waiver of claim where plaintiff failed to brief the claim aside from a single reference in its papers.

  • In re COVID-Related Restrictions on Religious Serv.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Non-Profit | State and Local Government
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen J. Neuberger, Thomas S. Neuberger, The Neuberger Firm, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Thomas C. Crumplar, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, DE for appellants.
    for defendant: Zi-Xiang Shen, Zachary S. Stirparo, State of Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for appellee.

    Case Number: 354, 2023

    Suit challenging the constitutionality of COVID-19 restrictions on houses of worship filed months after such restrictions were lifted was not a justiciable controversy, and state officials were immune from damages for any constitutional violations where they exercised their discretion to impose the conditions in a good faith effort to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Pinnacle Fertility Holdings, LP v. Jain

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ryan D. Stottmann, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Henry E. Gallagher, Jr., Connolly Gallagher LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: 2023-1280-MTZ

    Court declined to enforce arbitration provision against nonsignatory plaintiffs where their complaint did not seek to enforce the terms of the contract containing the arbitration clause.

  • Hyde Park Venture Partners Fund III, L.P. v. FairXchange, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: A. Thompson Bayliss, Samuel D. Cordle, Anthony R. Sarna, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE for petitioner.
    for defendant: David E. Ross, Garrett B. Moritz, Adam D. Gold, Elizabeth M. Taylor, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE for respondent.

    Case Number: 2022-0344-JTL

    Court relied on deal price as corporation's fair market value during appraisal where the price operated as a floor on company value due to errors by the CEO that left value on the table.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Texas Personal Automobile Insurance Policy 2020

    Authors: Janet K. Colaneri

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • In re: Insys Therapeutics Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Bankruptcy
    Industry: Legal Services | Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Williams
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Derek C. Abbott, Matthew O. Talmo, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric D. Madden, Reid Collins & Tsai LLP, Dallas, TX; Keith Y. Cohan, Ryan M. Goldstein, Morgan M. Menchaca, Reid Collins & Tsai LLP, Austin, TX for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Michael W. McDermott, Peter C. McGivney, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Richard C. Pedone, Brian T. Kelly, Nixon Peabody LLP, Boston, MA for defendant.

    Case Number: 19-11292 (JTD)

    Court determined that former officer was obligated to repay advanced legal expenses where he was ultimately convicted on a single racketeering conspiracy charge that included the same alleged predicate racketeering activities as the first indictment, undermining claims of partial success in the criminal prosecution.

  • InterMune, Inc. v. Harkonen

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: Biotechnology | Insurance | Pharmaceuticals
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Cook
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Karen A. Jacobs, Megan W. Cascio, Courtney Kurz, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Laurie Carr Mims, Benjamin D. Rothstein, Candice Mai Khanh Nguyen, Melissa Cornell, Catherine C. Porto, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, San Francisco, CA for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Michael A. Weidinger, Megan Ix Brison, Pinckney, Weidinger, Urban & Joyce LLC, Wilmington, DE; Elizabeth Sandza, Richard Sandza, Sandza Law, PLLC, Washington, DC for defendant.

    Case Number: 2021-0694-NAC

    Officer was obligated to reimburse corporation for advancement costs issued in connection with officer's criminal prosecution for actions taken in the course of his duties when that prosecution culminated in his conviction, precluding him from asserting good faith entitlement to indemnification under the Delaware General Corporation Law.

  • MSCM Holdings, Inc. v. PCS-Mosaic Holdings, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: Defense | Software | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Alan D. Albert, Stephen D. Dargitz, O’Hagan Meyer PLLC, Wilmington, DE; Charles M. Sims, C. Quinn Adams, O’Hagan Meyer, PLLC, Richmond, VA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: John G. Harris, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: 2022-0959-SG

    Court dismissed third-party claims as unable to provide relief if defendants were found liable to plaintiffs, and defendants' counterclaims for their failure to provide the contractually required pre-suit notice.

  • Fortis Advisors LLC v. Medtronic Minimed, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: Health Care | Investments and Investment Advisory | Manufacturing | Software
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Chancellor Adams
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ronald S. Gellert, Gellert Seitz Busenkell & Brown, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Derek J. Meyer, Prospect Law LLP, Los Angelos, CA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Jacqueline A. Rogers, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Victor L. Hou, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York, NY; Nowell D. Bamberger, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.

    Case Number: 2023-1055-MAA

    Court declined to find a breach of merger agreement where seller agreed to impose no specific contractual duties upon the buyer to achieve the milestone for a contingent payment, as the buyer had discretion to exercise business judgment provided its primary purpose was not to defeat the milestone payment.

  • Former SARcode Shareholder LLC v. Novartis Pharma AG

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Pharmaceuticals
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Cook
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John G. Harris, Halloran Farkas + Kittila LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Stephen C. Norman, Jaclyn C. Levy, Emma K. Diver, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: 2022-1053-NAC

    Court denied motion to vacate judgment dismissing action to enforce information rights on res judicata grounds where existence of underlying clinical trial data had been known to parties in prior action, where they could have sued to enforce their information rights.