Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
172 results for '* topic:"Labor Law"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-03-25
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Education
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Primos
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Elizabeth O. Groller for appellant.
for defendant: Gary W. Aber, Gary W. Aber, P.A. for appellee.
Case Number: D68920
Terminated employee entitled to unemployment benefits where his termination was without just cause as he was not put on notice regarding his conduct and his conduct was not sufficiently egregious to warrant termination in the absence of prior warning.
Publication Date: 2019-12-25
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: A. Thompson Bayliss and Adam K. Schulman, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter L. Welsh and Paul S. Kellogg, Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiff.
for defendant: T. Brad Davey and Andrew H. Sauder, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; David L. Feinberg and Fredric J. Bold, Jr., Bondurant Mixon & Elmore, LLP, Atlanta, GA for defendant.
Case Number: D68815
Former employer's amendment of breach of contract claim to remove all references to misuse of confidential information brought the claim outside the scope of the employer's indemnification obligations to its former employee for litigation that pertained to the employee's role as a director and officer.
Publication Date: 2019-12-11
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Consulting
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor McCormick
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bradley R. Aronstam and Eric D. Selden, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Nicholas J. Pappas, Robert S. Berezin, and Justin Michael DiGennaro, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: John A. Sensing, Clarissa R. Chenoweth, and Jesse L. Noa, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D68800
Court was not divested of subject matter jurisdiction under foreign law and regulation where plaintiffs' rights and remedies did not arise out of and were not inseparably related to foreign statutory law as to warrant their exclusive enforcement in a foreign tribunal.
Publication Date: 2019-12-04
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Automotive
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68790
District court correctly dismissed complaint where plaintiff had previously litigated his claims or could have raised claims in the prior litigation.
Publication Date: 2019-10-23
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Labor Law
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sherine Abdelfattahfathy, Wilmington, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Lindsay Neinast, Litter Mendelson, PC, Washington, DC for defendant.
Case Number: D68742
Pro se plaintiff established good cause for improper and untimely service due to confusion over correct deadline for service and based on plaintiff's good faith attempts to correct errors in service.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Janet K. Colaneri
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2019-10-02
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Agriculture
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stokes
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David T. Bailey, Seaford, DE, pro se appellant.
for defendant: Barry M. Willoughby and Lauren E.M. Russell, Rodney Square, Wilmington, DE, and Daniel C. Mulveny and Victoria W. Counihan, Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for appellees.
Case Number: D68718
Employee had not voluntarily resigned with good cause attributable to work where there was no evidence alternative position was outside employee's medical restrictions and where employee failed to give employer opportunity to address employee's physical or medical limitations before resigning.
Publication Date: 2019-09-25
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Greenaway
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68710
Appeal was dismissed as moot where appellant was provided with adequate notice of the disciplinary hearing leading to his suspension and where another suspension was so unlikely as to evade review and warrant an exception to the mootness doctrine.
Publication Date: 2019-09-11
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: E-Commerce
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Tia Drummond, Newark, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Jody Barillare, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorney for defendant.
Case Number: D68694
Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend denied where court had dismissed plaintiff's complaint and terminated the case and where plaintiff had not first filed a motion to open the judgment.
Publication Date: 2019-08-28
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Accounting | Health Care | Insurance
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor Bouchard
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thad. J. Bracegirdle and Julie M. O’Dell, Wilks, Lukoff & Bracegirdle LLC, Wilmington, DE, Jerome R. Bowen, Bowen Law Offices, Las Vegas, NV for plaintiff.
for defendant: Sean J. Bellew, Bellew, LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D68678
Company could force former CEO to provide accounting of transactions with company owned by the CEO, but failed to make prima facie case to require CEO to undertake accounting of all other challenged transactions since many other company employees were authorized to make expenditures.
Publication Date: 2019-07-24
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Software
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Zurn
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Douglas D. Herrman, James H.S. Levine, Ellis E. Herington and Jay A. Dubow, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Wilmington, DE and Philadelphia, PA for petitioners.
for defendant: Patricia L. Enerio and Aaron M. Nelson, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Adam P. Samansky, Frank J. Earley and Andre Cizmarik, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Pope, P.C., Boston, MA and New York, NY for respondent.
Case Number: D68639
Former directors and officers were entitled to some advancement under former employer's corporate charter where employer's allegations of misappropriation of confidential information and property arose, at least in part, from the former directors' and officers' status as directors and officers to which they were entitled advancement for claims arising from such status.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read