Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
163 results for '* topic:"Corporate Entities"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2018-09-12
Practice Area: Bankruptcy | Corporate Entities | Deals and Transactions
Industry: Energy
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Judge: Judge Carey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68281
By providing notice of exercise of a call option, a party bound was bound to the minimum floor price provided in an unambiguous agreement.
Publication Date: 2018-09-12
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Corporate Entities | Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry:
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: S. Mark Hurd, Alexandra M. Cumings, Danny David, Benjamin Sweet and Kelly Hanen for plaintiff
for defendant: A. Thompson Bayliss, Cameron T. Kirby, Matthew L. DiRisio and Thomas G. Weber for defendant.
Case Number: D68283
A party properly exercised its rights under a put agreement, so the company was contractually obligated to pay the put price.
Publication Date: 2018-07-11
Practice Area: Business Torts | Corporate Entities
Industry: Construction | Real Estate
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dean A. Campbell, Law Office of Dean A. Campbell, P.A., Georgetown, DE, attorney for plaintiff
for defendant: Richard E. Berl, Jr., Hudson, Jones, Jaywork & Fisher, LLC, Lewes, DE, attorney for defendants.
Case Number: D68206
Piercing of corporate veil granted where evidence indicated corporation fraudulently transferred sole asset to avoid collection by judgment creditor.
Publication Date: 2018-07-04
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Corporate Entities
Industry:
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor Bouchard
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen C. Norman, Daniyal M. Iqbal, David B. Hennes, Lisa H. Bebchick and Joseph G. Cleeman for plaintiffs
for defendant: Jon E. Abramczyk, D. McKinley Measley, Alexandra M. Cumings, William T. Pruit, Warren Haskel and Benjamin Cooper for defendants.
Case Number: D68205
Plaintiffs were not entitled to reimbursement of certain insurance payments following the sale of a subsidiary, because the purchase agreement did not provide for it.
Publication Date: 2018-06-27
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Wallace
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David B. Anthony and Sean A. Meluney for plaintiff
for defendant: Neil R. Lapinski for defendant.
Case Number: D68197
The operating agreement of a limited liability company required members to make additional capital contribu-tions at the manager's discretion, and other members had standing to sue a member who failed to respond to a capital call.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: T. BART GARY, JAKE CARROLL
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2018-06-27
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Hardware
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Theodore A. Kittila, James G. McMillan, III, Halloran Farkas & Kittila, LLP, Wilmington, DE; David Graff, Robins Kaplan LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for receiver
for defendant: David L. Finger, Finger & Slanina, LLC, Wilmington, DE, attorney for non-parties.
Case Number: D68191
Foreign national officers of Delaware corporation could be subject to contempt proceedings in Section 220 action pursuant to statutory personal jurisdiction and privity with corporation.
Publication Date: 2018-06-13
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry:
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas E. Hanson, Jr. and Jeffrey R. Blackwood for plaintiff
for defendant: Jonathan M. Stemerman for defendants.
Case Number: D68180
A party that was awarded expenses under the bad faith exception to the American Rule was not entitled to re-cover expenses incurred on a subsequent appeal, nor was it able to recover additional fees incurred at the trial level.
Publication Date: 2018-05-09
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel A. Dreisbach and Ryan P. Durkin, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr., Stephen L. Urbanczyk, Paul Mogin, Steven M. Cady, and Matthew H. Blumenstein, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, attorneys for plaintiffs
for defendant: Donald J. Wolfe, Jr., T. Brad Davey, and Seth R. Tangman, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew Ditchfield, David B. Toscano, Edward Fu, and Sagar D. Thakur, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for defendants.
Case Number: D68134
Cancellation certificate nullified where LLC failed to set aside reserve for viable, non-frivolous claims that it had knowledge of.
Publication Date: 2018-02-28
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Corporate Entities
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kenneth J. Nachbar, John P. DiTomo and Elizabeth A. Mullin for plaintiffs
for defendant: Stephen B. Brauerman, Sara E. Bussiere, Scott A. Edelman and Alan J. Stone for defendant.
Case Number: D68061
Plaintiffs were entitled to advancement for legal fees incurred on their behalf in civil lawsuits.
Publication Date: 2018-02-28
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry:
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor Bouchard
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin R. Shannon, Berton W. Ashman, Jr., Christopher N. Kelly, Jaclyn C. Levy, and Mathew A. Golden, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Philip S. Kaufman, Ronald S. Greenberg, Marjorie E. Sheldon, and Jared I. Heller, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for petitioner
for defendant: David L. Finger, Finger & Slanina LLC, Wilmington, DE; Peter B. Ladig and Brett M. McCartney, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; David B. Goldstein, Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Krinsky & Lieberman, P.C., New York, NY; Jeremy D. Eicher, Eicher Law LLC, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for respondents.
Case Number: D68056
Sale of petitioners interest in company to co-founder and opposing party approved, where custodian conducting sale enjoyed independence due to indemnification and advancement rights, and where petitioners objections to sale apparently motivated by animus toward opposing party.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read