Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
61 results for '* topic:"Class Actions"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2019-12-25
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David A. Felice, Gregory Y. Porter, Patrick Muench and Ryan T. Jenny, Bailey & Glasser, LLP, Wilming-ton, DE and Washington, D.C.; Daniel Feinberg and Todd Jackson, Feinberg, Jackson, Worthman & Wasow LLP, Berkeley, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Albert H. Manwaring, IV, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael J. Prame, Edward J. Meehan and Ross P. McSweeney, Groom Law Group, Washington, D.C. for defendant.
Case Number: D68818
Plaintiff met the ascertainability, numerosity and adequacy of representation requirements for a class action.
Publication Date: 2019-10-23
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Education
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert J. Cahall, McCormick & Priore, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Cary Ichter and William Daniel Davis, Ichter Davis LLC, Atlanta, GA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Robert J. Katzenstein, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE; Scott McIntosh, Quarles & Brady LLP, Washing-ton, DC for defendants.
Case Number: D68747
A prospective applicant for credit lacked standing to assert a claim under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, so the court dis-missed the complaint with prejudice.
Publication Date: 2019-10-16
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Energy | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael J. Barry and Michael T. Manuel, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilmington, DE; Peter B. Andrews and Craig J. Springer, Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington, DE; Jeremy Friedman, Spender Oster and David Tejtel, Friedman Oster & Tejtel PLLC, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Robert S. Saunders, Ronald N. Brown, III, Ryan M. Lindsay, Noelle M. Reed, Daniel S. Mayerfeld and Alston L. Walker, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Wilmington, DE and Houston, TX for defendant.
Case Number: D68737
The value of a derivative claim was not material in the context of a merger, so plaintiff lacked standing in this class action.
Publication Date: 2019-08-21
Practice Area: Class Actions | Securities Litigation
Industry: Legal Services | State and Local Government | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Fallon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D67672
The court granted an order appointing the lead plaintiff in this class action suit and approving the plaintiff's choice of counsel, despite defendants' objections due to a conflict of interest involving the law firm that filed the complaint.
Publication Date: 2019-05-08
Practice Area: Class Actions | Cybersecurity
Industry: Retail
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ralph N. Sianni, Andersen Sleater Sianni, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Janine Pollack, The Sultzer Law Group P.C., New York, NY; Daniel Tepper, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, NY; Ben Barnow and Erich P. Schork, Barnow and Assoc., P.C., Chicago, IL; Howard L. Longman and Melissa R. Emert, Stull, Stull & Brody, New York, NY; Charles E. Schaffer, Levin Sedran & Berman LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Jeffrey S. Goldenberg, Goldenberg Schneider, LPA, Cincinnati, OH; Gary Ma-son, Whitfield Bryson & Mason LLP, Washington, DC; Laurence D. King and David A. Straite, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP, New York, NY; John A. Yanchunis and Ryan McGee, Morgan & Morgan, Tampa, FL; Jean Sutton Martin, The Law Office of Jeane Sutton Martin PLLC, Wilmington, NC; Lynda J. Grant, The Grant Law Firm PLLC, New York, NY for plaintiff and pro-posed class.
for defendant: Jody C. Barillare, Gregory T. Parks, Ezra D. Church and Kristin M. Hadgis, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Wilmington, DE and Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
Case Number: D68553
Both public and private interests favored the transfer of this class action proceeding to a federal district court in another state, where a similar action was already pending.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2018-11-14
Practice Area: Class Actions | Securities Litigation
Industry: Automotive | Legal Services | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan and Michael J. Farnan of Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Phillip Kim of The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., New York, NY; Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer and David M. Sborz of Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington, DE; Ira M. Press, David A. Bishop and Thomas E. Elrod of Kirby Mcinerney LLP, New York, NY; Jeffrey M. Gorris and Christopher P. Quinn of Friedlander & Gorris, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Danielle S. Myers of Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA; P. Bradford deLeeuw of Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess, P.A.; Naumon A. Amjed, Darren J. Check and Ryan T. Degnan of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA, attorneys for plaintiffs
for defendant: Samuel A. Nolen and Katharine L. Mowrey of Richards Layton & Finger, P.A.; Douglas P. Baumstein and Susan L. Grace of White & Case LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for defendants.
Case Number: D68351
Institutional investor with largest financial interest in putative securities fraud class action was entitled to presumption as lead plaintiff despite falling afoul of the 5-in-3 Rule due to the statutory preference for institutional investors serving as lead plaintiffs in securities class actions.
Publication Date: 2018-05-30
Practice Area: Class Actions | Mergers and Acquisitions | Securities Litigation
Industry: Energy
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael Hanrahan, Paul A. Fioravanti, Jr., Kevin H. Davenport, Samuel L. Closic, and Eric J. Juray, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Marc A. Topaz, Lee D. Rudy, Eric L. Zagar, Michael C. Wagner, and Grant D. Goodhart, III, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA, attorneys for plaintiffs
for defendant: Rolin P. Bissel, James M. Yoch, Jr., and Benjamin M. Potts, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael C. Holmes, John C. Wander, Craig E. Zieminski, and Andrew E. Jackson, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Dallas, TX; David E. Ross and Benjamin Z. Grossberg, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; M. Scott Barnard, Michelle Reed, and Lauren E. York, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Dallas, TX, attorneys for defendants.
Case Number: D68160
Unitholders' complaint challenging private issuance of securities to insiders established unfairness of transaction, but did not warrant equitable relief cancelling the transaction where partnership was not injured by transaction.
Publication Date: 2018-05-09
Practice Area: Class Actions | Insurance Law
Industry: Health Care | Insurance
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard H. Cross, Jr., Christopher P. Simon, Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for plaintiffs
for defendant: Paul A. Bradley, Maron Marvel Bradley Anderson & Tardy, LLC, Wilmington, DE; George M. Church, Miles & Stockbridge, PC, Baltimore, MD; Meloney Perry, Perry Law, PC, Dallas, TX, attorneys for defendant.
Case Number: D68135
Motion to dismiss putative class action denied where court could not definitively determine that plaintiffs could not establish damage calculation method that would predominate over proposed class.
Publication Date: 2018-04-11
Practice Area: Class Actions | Employment Litigation
Industry: Chemicals and Materials
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Johnston
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert K. Beste and Jonathan Landesman for plaintiffs
for defendant: Stephanie E. O'Byrne and Kathleen Furey McDonough for defendant.
Case Number: D68105
Plaintiffs in this class action matter were entitled to pursue recovery of severance pay under state wage law, and their claims were filed within the statute of limitations.
Publication Date: 2018-03-28
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Johnston
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel C. Herr and Jack D. McInnes for plaintiffs and the putative class
for defendant: Elizabeth S. Fenton, Danielle N. Petaja, Matthew J. Hank and Helga P. Spencer for defendant.
Case Number: D68093
The choice-of-law provision in the parties employment contracts did not extend the reach of another states labor statutes where that states statutes and case law expressed an intent to narrowly limit their application.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read