Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
59 results for '* topic:"Products Liability"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-10-18
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: N17C-04-320 PPI
Medical expert testimony excluded where opinion was based on possibility rather than stated in terms of a reasonable degree of medical certainty.
Publication Date: 2022-05-31
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D69836
Products liability lawsuit dismissed where cited federal statutes failed to give rise to a private cause of action and plaintiff, a non-attorney, could not represent the heirs of the decedent.
Publication Date: 2022-05-24
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Jones
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert J. Leoni, Shelby & Leoni, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Colleen D. Shields, Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69829
Court excluded expert testimony to the extent it opined about corporate defendant's state of mind or the reasonableness of its actions or attempted to offer a legal conclusion, since such testimony would usurp the fact-finding province of the jury.
Publication Date: 2022-04-19
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Automotive | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Seitz
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael C. Dalton, Bartholomew J. Dalton, Ipek Kurul, Andrew C. Dalton, Dalton & Associates, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Adam L. Balick, Michael Collins Smith, Patrick J. Smith, Balick & Balick, LLC, Wilmington, DE for appellant.
for defendant: Brian D. Tome, Reilly, Mcdevitt & Henrich, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Susan M. Valinis, Reilly, Mcdevitt & Henrich, P.C., Philadelphia, PA for appellee.
Case Number: D69784
Plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to overcome summary judgment through circumstantial evidence demonstrating that decedent used asbestos-containing products on defendant's arc grinder machine.
Publication Date: 2022-03-08
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Carpenter
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph J. Rhoades, Stephen T. Morrow, Rhoades & Morrow LLC, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Trunk, Thomas E. Bosworth, Kline & Specter, P.C., Philadelphia, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Timothy Jay Houseal, Jennifer M. Kinkus, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Anthony M. Piscotti, Danny C. Lallis, Pisciotti Lallis Edreich, Florham Park, NJ for defendants.
Case Number: D69740
Failure to read user/instruction manual for product precluded a user injured by the product from pursuing a failure to warn claim.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Gary L. Brown
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2021-12-21
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Burke
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David G. Culley, Tybout, Redfearn & Pell, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff;
for defendant: Brian M. Rostocki, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69652
Product liability claim based on "indeterminate product test" dismissed where the test provided an evidentiary means of proving manufacturing defects but did not itself constitute a separate legal claim.
Publication Date: 2021-12-14
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Burke
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David G. Culley, Tybout, Redfearn & Pell, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff
for defendant: Brian M. Rostocki, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; J. David Bickham, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, CA; Michael K. Brown, Reed Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendants
Case Number: D69645
Motion to dismiss amended product liability claim involving medical device denied where the amended complaint asserted new facts further explaining the similarities between the product-in-suit and other products subject to consumer complaints and recalls.
Publication Date: 2021-08-04
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Consumer Products
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jerry Springsteen, Rochester, MN, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: N/A
Case Number: D69493
After screening a pleading filed by a pro se plaintiff, the court dismissed the complaint, but gave plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint.
Publication Date: 2021-06-02
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Scirica
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Benjamin Garrett Minegar, Jones Day, Pittsburgh, PA: Lawrence D. Rosenberg, Jones Day, Washington, DC; Jason J. Rawnsly, Richards Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE for appellants.
for defendant: John A. Sensing, Potter Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, DE for appellee.
Case Number: D69414
Denial of motion to vacate letters of request affirmed where the denial was not clearly erroneous as balance of factors of international comity weighed in favor of granting litigant's request to seek extraterritorial discovery from a non-party in support of its claims in the underlying legal action.
Publication Date: 2021-05-12
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Rocanelli
Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Joseph Hrubiec, Napoli Shkolnik LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Brian M. Rostocki, Justin M. Forcier, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; Barbara R. Binis, Stephen J. McConnell, Whitney L. Mayer and Christian W. Saucedo, Reed Smith LLP, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
Case Number: D69396
The statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' pelvic mesh claim, so the court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read