Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
79 results for '* topic:"Employment Litigation"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2021-05-12
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael P. Kelly, Andrew S. Dupre, Janine L. Faben, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Blake Bennett, Dean R. Roland, Cooch & Taylor PA, Wilmington, DE; Lawrence V. Cronin, Smith Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D69391
Employer was entitled to shift fees against employee who breached non-compete agreement and then falsely testified in the subsequent litigation regarding his motivation and the circumstances surrounding his breach.
Publication Date: 2021-02-24
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Chemicals and Materials
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gary W. Aber, Aber, Baker & Over, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Margaret M. DiBianca, Clark Hill PLC, Wilmington, DE; John M. Nolan, John M. Nolan, III, Jackson Lewis PC, Philadelphia,PA for defendant.
Case Number: D69308
Employee failed to demonstrate that her termination or surveillance by her employer violated the Family and Medical Leave Act.
Publication Date: 2021-02-24
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Theopalis K. Gregory, Isaac H. Green, Jr., Law Office of Theopalis Gregory Sr., Wilmington, DE for plain-tiff.
for defendant: Caitlyn E. Quinn, Laura Najemy, City of Wilmington Law Dep’t, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69309
Employee stated a claim for retaliation because she was engaged in a protected employee activity, but the court granted employer's motions to dismiss other employment claims.
Publication Date: 2021-02-17
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Garrett B. Moritz, S. Reiko Rogozen, Holly E. Newell, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Wil-liam Savitt, Anitha Reddy, Sarah K. Eddy, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, NY; Ronald L. Olson, John W. Spiegel, Luis Li, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Jonathan I Kravis, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
for defendant: Daniel C. Herr, Law Office of Daniel C. Herr, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Kristen E. Hudson, The Benson Firm PLLC, Austin, TX for defendant.
Case Number: D69299
The court denied defendant's motions to dismiss because the parties did not incorporate a forum selection clause into their separation agreement, and plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to support its claim for fraud in the inducement.
Publication Date: 2021-01-13
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Shwartz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D69258
A probationary officer was an at-will employee, so he did not have a protected property interest in his con-tinued employment.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2021-01-06
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: William D. Fletcher, Jr., Dianna E. Louder, Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Kevin A. Guerke, Young, Conway, Stargate & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69250
Former employee failed to allege sufficient facts to support her claims for sex discrimination or retaliation.
Publication Date: 2020-08-12
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ricky Thompson-El, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Karine Sarkisian and Marc Stephen Casarino, White & Williams, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69084
In this age discrimination matter, the court denied a motion to dismiss and allowed plaintiff an opportunity to supplement the record with a right-to-sue letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Publication Date: 2020-06-17
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor LeGrow
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Martin S. Lessner, Lauren Dunkle Fortunato and Kevin P. Rickert, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Gregory P. Williams, Blake Rohrbacher, Matthew D. Perri and Kevin M. Regan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Joseph G. Santoro and Roger W. Feicht, Gunster, West Palm Beach, FL for defendants.
Case Number: D69018
Plaintiffs stated claims for breach of their employment agreements and for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, but the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss the remainder of their claims.
Publication Date: 2020-06-03
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Jurden
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin R. Slattery, Delaware Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for the state.
for defendant: Lance Green, O’Donoghue and O’Donoghue, LLP, New Castle, DE for employees.
Case Number: D69004
Two employees were entitled to differential pay when they worked additional night shifts at the request of the agency.
Publication Date: 2020-04-15
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Health Care
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory B. Williams and E. Chaney Hall, Fox Rothschild LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jeffrey J. Bushofsky and Timothy R. Farrell, Ropes & Gray LLP, Chicago, IL for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Travis S. Hunter and Tyler E. Cragg, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Grant A. Wright and Max D. Wright, Wright Law, P.C., Tuscumbia, AL for defendants.
Case Number: D68945
The court denied plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction that would have shut down defendants' competing business, because plaintiffs failed to establish that they were likely to succeed on the merits.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read