Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
61 results for '* topic:"Class Actions"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-10-15
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Agriculture
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Fallon
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Misty A. Seemans, Office of the Public Defender, Wilmington, DE; Marco Simons, Richard Herz, Marissa Vahlsing, Bejamin Hoffman, EarthRights International, Washington, DC; Jonathan Kaufman, Law Office of Jonathan Kaufman, New York, NY; Judith Brown Chomsky, Law Offices of Judith Brown Chomsky, Elkins Park, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Susan Hannigan Cohen, Travis S. Hunter, Alexandra M. Ewing, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Jeffrey T. Green, Green Law Chartered, Bethesda, MD; Marisa S. West, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.
Case Number: 17-1494-JFB-SRF
Court approved class action settlement on behalf of farmers where most of the settlement funds went to fund community programs for class members, who constituted economically disadvantaged farmers in developing countries.
Publication Date: 2023-08-28
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Smith
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John P. Elliott, Kyle M. Elliott, Stewart J. Greenleaf, Jr., Mark J. Schwemler, Elliott Greenleaf, Blue Bell, PA for petitioner.
for defendant: Charles Kannebecker, Milford, PA for respondent.
Case Number: 22-8056
The issue before the court was when the timeframe for filing an interlocutory appeal of a class certification order could be extended under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), which authorizes interlocutory review of orders "granting or denying class-action certification" of petitions filed within 14 days of the order. Here, petitioner filed a Rule 23(f) petition 14 days after the district court had revised its class certification order but months after the original order certifying the class. Respondent, who had received disabilit
Publication Date: 2023-02-21
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Automotive | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Williams
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kelly A. Green, Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE; Russell D.
Paul, Abigail J. Gertner, Amey J. Park, Natalie Lesser, Berger Montague PC, Philadelphia, PA; Tarek H. Zohdy, Cody R. Padgett, Laura Goolsby, Capstone Law APC, Los Angeles, CA; Steven Calarnusa, Geoff Stahl, Rachel Bentley, Gordon & Partners, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, FL; Geoffrey Graber, Brian E. Johnson, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Washington, DC for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Patrick M. Brannigan, Jessica L. Reno, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Stephen A. D’Aunoy, Scott H. Morgan, Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, MO for defendants
Case Number: 22-116-GBW
The court granted a motion to dismiss in part in a class action matter filed by vehicle owners against an engine manufacturer and distributor.
Publication Date: 2022-07-05
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Bruce McNew, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: David A. Dorey, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Christopher M. Mason, Nixon Peabody LLP, New York, NY; Carolyn G. Nussbaum, Nixon Peabody LLP, Rochester, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D69870
Court certified class of stockholders challenging self-tender transaction for misleading corporate disclosures, where certification was appropriate for the purposes of establish breach of duty and nominal damages, although the question of rescission damages would be individual to each stockholder.
Publication Date: 2022-05-03
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Bruce McNew, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Randall J. Baron, David A. Knotts, Robbins Geller Rudman & Down, LLP, San Diego, CA; Kent Bronson, Milberg Tadler Phillips Grossman LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Kevin G. Abrams, J. Peter Shindel, Jr., Matthew L. Miller, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Richard D. Heins, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Patricia L. Enerio, Melissa N. Donimirski, Jamie L. Brown, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Weidinger, Elizabeth Wilburn Joyce, Pinckney, Weidinger, Urban & Joyce, Greenville, DE; Lori Marks-Esterman, Renee M. Zaytsev, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D69798
The court approved a modification to a class action settlement and a more efficient distribution method than the traditional notice-and-claim process.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2021-11-09
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Seth Rigrodsky, Herbert W. Mondros, Rigrodsky Law P.A., Wilmington, DE; Eya Dror, Shelly L. Friedland, Stan Gutgarts, Ted Trief, Trief & Olk, New York, NY; Macy D. Hanson, The Law Office of Macy D. Hanson PLLC, Madison, MS; Peter S. Pearlman, Cohn, Lifland, Pearlman, Herrman, & Knopf LLP, Saddle Brook, NJ for plaintiffs.
for defendant: J. Cory Falgowski, H. Carlton Hilson, Kristin Bryance Metheny, Ronald W. Flowers, Burr & Forman LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D69598
The court held that since plaintiffs, who were agents of defendant company, filed their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act after the deadline for underpayment claims, their claims should be dismissed with prejudice.
Publication Date: 2021-08-11
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Herbert W. Mondros, Rigrodsky Law, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Howard B. Prossnitz, Law Offices of Howard Prossnitz, Oak Park, IL; Adam Szulczewski, Chicago IL for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Matthew Denn, DLA Piper LLP (US), Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D69498
Plaintiffs made a judicial admission regarding the tolling of their tort claims, and they failed to establish any other basis for tolling the statute of limitations.
Publication Date: 2021-04-21
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Herbert Weiswasser Mondros, Rigrodsky Law, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Howard B. Prossnitz, Law Offices of Howard Prossnitz, Oak Park, IL; Adam Szulczewski, Chicago, IL for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Matthew Denn, DLA Piper LLP (US), Wilmington, DE; David S. Sager, DLA Piper LLP (US), Short Hills, NJ for defendant.
Case Number: D69370
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss because the putative plaintiffs in this class action pro-ceeding failed to meet the heightened pleading standard for their fraud claims.
Publication Date: 2020-12-16
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Greenberg
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter B. Andrews, David M. Sborz, Craig J. Springer, Andrews & Springer, Greenville, DE; Randall Baron, Joseph D. Daley, David T. Wissbroecker, Robbins Geller Rudman & Down, San Diego, CA; Christopher H. Lyons, Robbins Geller Rudman & Down, Nashville, TN for plaintiff.
for defendant: Deborah S. Birnback, Jennifer B. Luz, Goodwin Procter, Boston, MA; David John Teklits, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, DE for defendant Cowan. Anne S. Gaza, Elena C. Norman, Robert M. Vrana, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, DE for defendant LBT Merger Sub, Inc. Adam T. Humann, Kevin R. Powell, II, Kirkland Ellis, Washington, DC; Joshua Z. Rabinovitz, Kirkland Ellis, Chicago, IL for HIG Capital and Lionbridge Tech., Inc.
Case Number: D69226
Plaintiff in this class action suit failed to demonstrate the existence of a material misrepresentation, so the court affirmed the judgment in favor of defendants.
Publication Date: 2020-09-23
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Energy
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael Van Gorder, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Nadeem Faruqi, James M. Wilson, Jr., Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Peter J. Walsh, Jr., Alan R. Silverstein, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; S. Mark Hurd, Thomas P. Will, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; David D. Sterling, Paul R. Elliott, Matthew B. Allen, Baker Botts LLP, Houston, TX; Michelle A. Reed, M. Scott Barnard, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Dallas, TX for defendants.
Case Number: D69129
The court granted defendants' motion to dismiss all claims asserted by class action plaintiffs in connection with this merger transaction.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read