Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
79 results for '* topic:"Employment Litigation"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-10-08
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Health Care | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Will
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John M. Seaman, G. Mason Thomson, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ryan Q. Keech, K&L Gates LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Matthew B. Goeller, K&L Gates LLP, Wilmington, DE; Carl Alan Roth, Roth Ames LLP, La Habra, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: John P. DiTomo, Lauren K. Neal, Courtney Kurz, Taylor A. Christensen, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 2022-1192-LWW
Court ruled that company's former LLP agreement's vesting and forfeiture terms for partnership units could be incorporated into restricted stock agreement following company's corporate conversion and exchange of employee's units for restricted stock.
Publication Date: 2024-10-01
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Montgomery-Reeves
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Margherita A. Capolino, Caroline English, Pascal F. Naples, ArentFox Schiff, Washington, DC; Elizabeth Hopkins, Susan L. Meter, Kantor & Kantor, Northridge, CA; Teresa Renaker, Kristen G. Scott, Renaker Scott, San Francisco, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Curtis J. Crowther, Robinson & Cole, Wilmington, DE; Linda L. Morkan, Robinson & Cole, Hartford, CT; Timothy J. Snyder, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, DE; Melissa D. Hill, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, New York, NY; Brian M. Killian, James D. Nelson, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Washington, DC; Russell L. Hirschhorn, Proskauer Rose, New York, NY; John E. Roberts, Proskauer Rose, Boston, MA; Jennifer C. Wasson, Potter Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, DE; Anthony F. Shelley, Theresa S. Gee, Miller & Chevalier, Washington, DC; C. Scott Reese, Cooch & Taylor, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 23-1499
Family trust established to pay pensions to domestic employees was not subject to ERISA coverage where it could not qualify as a multiple-employer plan due to the lack of necessary connection between the family members and the family members' lack of involvement in managing the trust.
Publication Date: 2024-09-03
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Health Care | Investments and Investment Advisory | Manufacturing
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ethan H. Townsend, Aaron P. Sayers, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Wilmington, DE; Rachel B. Cowen, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Chicago, IL; Morris J. Fodeman, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, New York, NY; Jeffery S. Hood, Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP, San Diego, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Philip A. Rovner, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Nimalka Wickramasekera, Winston & Strawn LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Brian J. Nisbet, Elizabeth S. Deshaies, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, John C. Sanders, Jr., Winston & Strawn LLP, Dallas, TX for defendants.
Case Number: 2017-0720-SG
Failure to disclose passive investment in competitor did not by itself constitute a breach of loyalty where there was no evidence executive acted against his employer's interests, used the investment to obtain an advantage, or had a conflict of interest.
Publication Date: 2024-08-27
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John M. Seaman, E. Wade Houston, Joseph A. Sparco, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Nicholas G. Hill, Rebecca M. Borkovich, McGuireWoods LLP, Atlanta, GA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: David E. Ross, Eric D. Selden, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Martin L. Roth, P.C., Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL; Haley S. Stern, Amanda Lamothe-Cadet, Maylynn Chen, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case Number: 2023-0513-PAF
Former vice presidents were entitled to advancement rights from company in company's IP misappropriation action where certificate of incorporation and bylaws granted advancement to officers, defined as including vice presidents, for claims arising from their service to the company or at the company's request.
Publication Date: 2023-10-09
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kate Butler, Kate Butler Law LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Scott G. Wilcox, Moore and Rutt, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: N22M-02-006 EMD
Concluding that plaintiff did not have a present right to join the state pension plan, the court ruled that it could not issue a writ of mandamus. Moreover, the petition for a writ of mandamus to allow plaintiff to participate in the state pension plan was barred by the three-year statute of limitations as no claim as to a present right to mandamus was presented.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-09-18
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Health Care | Legal Services
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: District Judge Wharton
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michele D. Allen, Delia A. Clark, Allen & Associates, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Daniel C. Herr, Law Office of Daniel C. Herr LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: N20C-08-186 FWW
Court reduced employment discrimination plaintiff's proposed attorney's fee award on grounds that plaintiff had mixed success on her claims and her counsel appeared to have overstaffed the case since it did not involve complex or novel issues.
Publication Date: 2023-08-21
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel Rivera, Philadelphia, PA, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Kathleen Furey McDonough, Jennifer Penberthy Buckley, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 21-1825-CFC
Court denied employer motion for summary judgment on former employee's discrimination/wrongful termination claim where employee alleged that his supervisor directed a discriminatory remark towards him, creating a triable issue of fact as to pretext where employer terminated employee for using inappropriate language but, despite being informed of the supervisor's comment, imposed no discipline on the supervisor.
Publication Date: 2023-03-28
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dennis Dizon, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Kaan Ekiner, Cozen O’Connor, Wilmington DE for defendant.
Case Number: D70181
The court granted defendant's motion to compel arbitration on the basis that the arbitration agreement was clear and unambiguous. Although plaintiff argued that the agreement was unconscionable as it was signed as a precondition to his employment, the court disagreed and pointed out that courts routinely enforce arbitration agreements that are a precondition to employment.
Publication Date: 2022-12-13
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Biotechnology | Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Butler
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael W. McDermott, David B. Anthony, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Bryan J. Wick, Jack Lilley, Wick Phillips Gould & Martin, LLP, Dallas TX for plaintiff.
for defendant: Blake Rohrbacher, Samuel J. Gray, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Matthew Messerli, The Messerli Law Firm, Trophy Club, TX for defendant.
Case Number: N21C-12-131 CEB
Suit for wages and severance pay was not dismissed where employer identified no condition precedent to terminated employee's right to receive wages, and where there were outstanding issues of material fact concerning whether employer had materially breached the parties' contract, entitling employee to receive separation pay.
Publication Date: 2022-12-06
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Health Care
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Primos
Attorneys: For plaintiff: M. Denise Tolliver, Camden, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Tiffany R. Hubbard, Pamela Moore, McCarter & English, LLP, Hartford, CT; Chelsea A. Botsch, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware for defendants.
Case Number: K21C-06-040 NEP
The court found for defendant corporation in an employment litigation sounding in discrimination and defamation claims.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read