0 results for 'undefined'
New Hampshire Jury Hits Exxon Mobil with $236 Million Verdict in MTBE Case
Employer Has No Right to Subrogation in Third Party Settlement
The state Supreme Court has ruled in a workers' compensation subrogation case that an employer has no right to a portion of a settlement between a former worker and a third party because the third party didn't cause the employee's compensable ...City, Agency Settle Suit Over Children of Battered Mothers
Censure Order — Michael D. Halbfish
Notice to the bar.Williams v. Houston Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund
The court disagrees with the holdings in Arnett and Herschbach that a municipality's exercise of statutorily prescribed functions with respect to a statutory pension plan is a propriety function of the municipality.View more book results for the query "*"
DA MoneyCauses anUnlikelyBudget Jam
Greg [email protected] Senate and House appear stymied over the proposed $17.4 billion budget, and one key difference lies in funding for the judicial budget.The conflict, however, does not involve the Public Defender Standards Council, despite the group's fears that it wouldn't get full funding. Rather, it's the district attorneys' budget that, at least initially, seems to be getting short shrift.From the Experts: Preparing for Whistleblowers Under Dodd-Frank
While there is no sure way for a company faced with a securities violation to ensure that it will not become the subject of a whistleblower report, there are steps corporate counsel can take to minimize the risk.Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 15, No. 2 - January 3, 2007
Feds Fire 281-Page Salvo in Bid to Alter Fumo's Sentence
Weighing in at 281 pages and more than 53,000 words, the appellate brief filed by the Justice Department on Thursday to challenge the leniency of the 55-month sentence imposed on former state Sen. Vincent Fumo is like a Harry Potter novel for the judiciary -- highly anticipated, loaded with entertaining vocabulary, and chock full of talk about darkness and wicked ways.3rd Circuit Says Resentencing Required in Post-'Booker' Appeals
After months of dropping hints, the 3rd Circuit made an explicit announcement Thursday regarding dozens of pending criminal appeals in which defendants have challenged their sentences in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's January decision that converted the sentencing guidelines from mandatory to advisory. The bottom line: All of the cases in the appellate pipeline at the time of the Court's decision in United States v. Booker will be sent back to the district courts for resentencing.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250