By Colby Hamilton | July 10, 2018
The panel said the petition to have Cravath produce documents it held on behalf of its client, Royal Dutch Shell, would do damage to the trust foreign companies have in the United States' litigation process.
By Jim Saunders, News Service of Florida | July 10, 2018
The First District Court of Appeal extended a stay of a lower court ruling that would require the Florida Department of Health to quickly turn over death certificates from across the state to attorneys for The Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills.
By John Council | July 5, 2018
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit criticized U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes in a recent decision after he apparently attributed a female…
By Amanda Bronstad | July 3, 2018
The Missouri Court of Appeals decision on June 29 is the third ruling to reverse a jury award against Johnson & Johnson over its baby powder, which thousands of lawsuits have alleged caused women to get ovarian cancer.
By Dan M. Clark | July 3, 2018
The attorneys general filed a motion for expedited discovery in Washington's Western District Monday, along with 99 declarations from people involved with or affected by the separation policy.
By Greg Land | July 2, 2018
The opinion, written by Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Harris Hines, said the plaintiff's discovery that nursing staff may have violated hospital rules meant that a new claim could be added to the lawsuit, even though the statute of limitations had run.
By Max Mitchell | July 2, 2018
New York City has been hit with sanctions for failing to turn over evidence related to a civil lawsuit alleging several police officers used excessive force during a 2014 arrest.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By James J. DeCarlo, Jamie L. Ryerson and Alyssa Wall | June 28, 2018
Despite a seeming lack of case law on the issue, patent practitioners should not hesitate to rely upon the Rule 26 proportionality requirement to attempt to “rein in” discovery costs.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Leonard Deutchman | June 28, 2018
Typically, a client obtaining e-discovery services enters into an agreement with an e-discovery vendor. Such agreements may be for a single provision of services, but if the client is a regular client of the vendor, the parties will often enter into a master agreement that sets forth key legal and business terms, with a statement of work drafted for each provision of services setting out the particulars of that engagement.
By Leonard Deutchman, KLDiscovery | June 28, 2018
Typically, a client obtaining e-discovery services enters into an agreement with an e-discovery vendor. But recently, parties are adding a separate set of provisions: obligations arising from the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...