The Legal Intelligencer | Analysis|News
By Amanda O'Brien | November 10, 2023
While a majority of general training is conducted virtually, in-person mock trial activities are a common thread between the training regimens at Duane Morris, Fox Rothschild, and Blank Rome.
By Stephanie Wilkins | November 10, 2023
DISCO, along with current CFO Michael Lafair and former CEO Kiwi Camara, were named in a class action complaint filed in New York State court alleging violations of federal securities laws for misleading investors following the company's IPO. This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.
By Cassandre Coyer | November 10, 2023
A panel of judges at the Georgetown University Law Center's annual Advanced eDiscovery Institute conference explored some of the takeaways from this year's discovery case law, from what ESI protocols should look like to the grounds for relevancy redactions.
By Ryan Hemmel, ProSearch | November 10, 2023
An overview of the latest Microsoft 365 features available and coming soon to improve discovery.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Jennifer Mott Williams and Bansri McCarthy | November 6, 2023
In this installment of our ongoing series on e-discovery and information governance, we will delve into the world of AI and discuss how organizations can mitigate legal and compliance risks and maintain an evolving approach to an equally evolving technology.
By David Kalat, BRG | November 6, 2023
In November 1958, Hans Peter Luhn created a machine with the seemingly magical ability to process human language, efficiently sifting and sorting words—also known as keywords, which would be come a cornerstone of e-discovery and other legal process.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Patricia E. Antezana | October 31, 2023
One mechanism that courts can use to limit discovery is Federal Rule 26(b)(2)(C). Rule 26(b)(2)(C) instructs that a court must limit the frequency or extent of discovery if it determines that: "the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or can be obtained from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive; the party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity to obtain the information by discovery in the action; or the proposed discovery is outside the scope permitted by Rule 26(b)(1)."
By Cassandre Coyer | October 27, 2023
Some worry that the California law will increase discovery costs as professionals are forced to deploy more resources earlier on to meet the new requirements.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Kelly A. Lavelle | October 26, 2023
As technology continues to advance, legal professionals should embrace TAR as an invaluable tool in the search for efficient, accurate, and cost-effective legal document review.
By Isha Marathe | October 25, 2023
As e-discovery professionals seek to understand the specific impact of generative AI, some considerations are more pressing than others.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...
Rogers Law Offices is seeking highly motivated and experienced attorneys to join our dynamic team. The ideal candidate will possess a stron...
Description:NFSA has a great opportunity for a Labor Relations Associate and Junior Counsel. This position will support NFSA's collective ba...