New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | October 15, 2018
One might make a strong argument that cases involving such cutting edge theories of causality should be assigned specially, as medical malpractice cases once were and as certain commercial disputes presently are, to a particular judge in the venue who would be the most competent to make difficult decisions as were made by the trial judge in Accutane.
By Katheryn Tucker | October 10, 2018
The decision is a victory for prosecutors, who can now proceed with a rape case against a man whose stepdaughter and wife left the country after reporting the abuse.
Connecticut Law Tribune | News
By Robert Storace | October 9, 2018
According to a lawsuit filed in federal court Friday, Steven Bongiovanni stole confidential information from Graham Capital Management. The company is suing to get the information back.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Michael J. Hutter | October 3, 2018
In his Evidence column, Michael J. Hutter writes: Assuming that an expert's opinion is admissible, even though it is based upon inadmissible evidence, another issue is present. May the reliable but out-of-court and inadmissible statement or document upon which the opinion is based also be admitted? Expressed differently, does the inadmissible evidence become admissible because of its use as a basis for an expert's opinion?
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Lawrence M. Pearson | October 1, 2018
For employment law practitioners, understanding subtler forms of bias can be critical to sustaining or defending against a discrimination or harassment claim, as these cases often do not include a “smoking gun” piece of evidence or an allegation that neatly fulfills the various requirements of a cause of action.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Zack Needles | September 27, 2018
A litigant who asserts attorney-client privilege before trial may not unfairly surprise their adversary by waiving that privilege on the stand, a deeply split Pennsylvania Superior Court en banc has ruled, reaching the same conclusion arrived at by a divided three-judge panel in 2016.
By Ellis Kim | September 27, 2018
Arizona prosecutor Rachel Mitchell's performance has divided attorneys following along on social media, with some calling her questions standard, while others said she's acting like a defense attorney for Republicans.
By Dara Kam | September 27, 2018
The list of witnesses gives just a glimpse into the allegations made by a legislative aide, who filed the discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in January.
By Mike Scarcella | September 26, 2018
Lawyers for Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford have submitted evidentiary documents they intend to use at Thursday's hearing—pages from Kavanaugh's 1982 summer calendar, and four declarations supporting Ford's claims that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a high school party.
By Amanda Bronstad | September 24, 2018
After a week of deliberations, the jury failed to reach a verdict, telling the judge they were deadlocked at 8 to 4.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...