By Meghann M. Cuniff | July 11, 2022
Counsel for the Commission on Judicial Performance and the judge's lawyer submitted detailed reports to the three special masters who will recommend Judge Michael Murray's punishment, which could include removal from the bench.
By Andrew Goudsward | July 8, 2022
Robert Costello, a partner at the New York firm Davidoff, Hutcher & Citron, said he might be called as a witness on behalf of his client.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Michael J. Slocum | July 6, 2022
Given emojis' increasing prevalence in the workplace, employers and their counsel should familiarize themselves with the issues this newest form of communication can create.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Jules Epstein | July 6, 2022
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by five conservative colleagues, eviscerated federal habeas review in a recent decision, Shinn v. Ramirez, 212 L. Ed. 2d 713 (2022). To understand its devastating reach, one must understand how ineffective assistance of counsel claims are litigated.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Benjamin Rosenberg | July 5, 2022
Can the court abrogate the employer's privilege over the objection of the employer, and if so under what circumstances? This article discusses two cases in which the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit addressed this question, holding that the court could not abrogate the employer's privilege.
By Andrew Goudsward | June 29, 2022
Cassidy Hutchinson, a former White House aide who gave a dramatic behind-the-scenes account of the Trump White House on Jan. 6, is counseled by two veteran Alston & Bird litigators, Jody Hunt and William Jordan.
By Michael A. Mora | June 29, 2022
"Jurors will sit there and say, 'You must be kidding me! The captain would put them through those conditions?' " Michael Haggard, the managing partner at the Haggard Law Firm, said about a viral video that captured a portion of the deadly parasailing incident.
By Allison Dunn | June 28, 2022
In its first application of the Daubert standard regarding the admissibility of expert testimony, the Maryland Court of Appeals has affirmed that a trial court acted within its discretion to admit a scientist's testimony about the use of photogrammetry to identify a murder suspect's height, despite an unknown degree of uncertainty in the measurements.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Peter A. Crusco | June 27, 2022
The Court of Appeals clearly articulated that the law in New York for admission of digital evidence requires application of the standard evidentiary rubrics, and is reviewed on appeal per the burdensome "abuse of discretion standard as a matter of law."
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Michael Furey, Patrick J. McDonnell and Merrill E. Gershwin | June 16, 2022
Examining the methodology of 'peer review' and the need for courts to examine whether an expert's opinion is based upon vetted scientific research.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...