By Colleen Murphy | May 12, 2022
New Jersey Assemblywoman Michele Matsikoudis, R-Union, joined Sen. Kristin Corrado, R-Passaic, in proposing that "conversations with close confidants following an incident of sexual assault or employment discrimination should be admissible in civil cases."
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Jules Epstein | May 12, 2022
The following essay is from a compilation of cross-examination techniques and tools that will be published later this spring. It is this author's contribution, describing a technique that may be appropriate only occasionally or on idiosyncratic cases but one that in those instances is an effective if not powerful one.
By Meghann M. Cuniff | May 9, 2022
"That's one thing you're not going to see in any case law," said attorney Chris Wesierski, who represents Avenatti's former clients William Parrish and Timothy Fitzgibbons.
By ALM Staff | May 4, 2022
The ruling and a summary by the Law Journal's decisions editors can be found here.
By Michael A. Mora | April 27, 2022
"[T]he evidence presented strongly suggests that the 2013 operating agreement relied upon" by the defendant in pursuing "his motions for disqualification and sanctions was a forgery," the trial judge ruled.
By Jane Wester | April 27, 2022
Trump's attorney Alina Habba of Habba Madaio & Associates argued that all documents responsive to the AG's subpoenas were produced months earlier in the multiyear investigation.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Peter A. Crusco | April 25, 2022
This article highlights several recent interesting decisions, and the bar they appear to set for trial practitioners to admit digital communications evidence at trial.
By Emily M. McAdam | April 25, 2022
In the face of no controlling Arkansas case law on the matter, the Eighth Circuit made an "Erie-educated guess" as to what the Arkansas Supreme Court would do and held that Gerber could still establish proximate cause despite there being no resolution to the underlying case.
By Colleen Murphy | April 22, 2022
The appeals court said the lower court "erred by misapplying the foregone conclusion standard and importing Fourth Amendment principles into what is purely a Fifth Amendment inquiry."
By ALM Staff | April 19, 2022
The ruling and a summary by the Law Journal's decisions editors can be found here.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...