The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Jules Epstein | March 25, 2020
The dangers of limiting instructions are clear—they sometimes exacerbate the impact of the problematic proof, yet we teach Rule 105 as a fix to almost all risky evidence and then proceed under the myth that jurors will follow them to the "t."
By David Horrigan, Relativity | March 23, 2020
A recent federal court decision from New York, United States v. Morgan, explores Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) and the 37 years it can take to crack an iPhone if one selects the six-digit password option.
By Suzette Parmley | March 19, 2020
"The trial court erred by admitting both prejudicial testimony" but "the evidence against Trinidad was overwhelming," the Supreme Court's majority said.
By Greg Land | March 12, 2020
A Lithonia family seeking more than $700,000 for losses in a house fire got nothing from a federal jury, instead ordering them to reimburse Travelers Insurance's cash advance and investigation costs.
By Jacqueline Thomsen | March 10, 2020
The ruling is a significant win for the House, after it suffered a recent loss in its bid to compel testimony from former White House counsel Don McGahn.
By Kraig Ahalt and Jeffrey A. Udell | March 6, 2020
There is no question that law enforcement's use of consumer genetic testing databases will soon grow exponentially.
By Diane P. Sullivan and Jed P. Winer | March 6, 2020
This list will serve as a practical starting point to begin developing creative points for an effective cross-examination of the other side's expert.
By Diane P. Sullivan and Jed P. Winer | March 6, 2020
This list will serve as a practical starting point to begin developing creative points for an effective cross-examination of the other side's expert.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Zack Needles | March 5, 2020
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has declined to review a Superior Court ruling that a grocery store spoliated evidence when it deleted portions of a surveillance video the plaintiff had requested in a slip-and-fall case, letting stand a precedential decision that one civil litigator said should give pause to business owners and lawyers on both sides of the courtoom aisle.
By Jacqueline Thomsen | March 5, 2020
A federal judge said the McGahn circuit opinion has likely cancelled out the House's arguments in its subpoena seeking Donald Trump's tax returns.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...