By Mike Scarcella and MP McQueen | August 16, 2019
Kraft Food Groups and Mondelēz Global complained about what the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission said regarding a $16 million settlement announced this week. Now, a Chicago judge wants to hear from the agency.
By Mike Scarcella | MP McQueen | August 16, 2019
Kraft Food Groups and Mondelēz Global complained about what the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission said regarding a $16 million settlement announced this week. Now, a Chicago judge wants to hear from the agency.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Lewis Goldshore | August 15, 2019
New arbitration hearing required in 'US Masters' case.
By David Notowitz | August 8, 2019
Video evidence plays a huge role in courts, and the level of trust given to that evidence can affect whether someone walks free or winds up behind bars.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Charles Toutant | August 6, 2019
Some defense attorneys suspect that not all of the cases will have to be reheard.
By Charles Toutant | August 5, 2019
Some defense attorneys suspect that not all of the cases will have to be reheard.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier | August 5, 2019
Without question, the most effective deterrence to the destruction or alteration of medical records in an effort to evade liability for medical malpractice liability is the potential for a punitive damages award to be imposed against the offending party. In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier discuss a decision in which the Second Department upheld such an award for that precise misconduct.
By Tom McParland | August 2, 2019
Manhattan prosecutors have issued a subpoena on President Donald Trump's business in its investigation of alleged hush payments to Stephanie Clifford, the adult-film performer known as Stormy Daniels, ahead of the 2016 election.
By Jim Saunders | August 1, 2019
In a concurrence, Judge Cory Ciklin wrote that a new trial was required because it could not be shown that critical testimony from the highway patrol officer meet the expert-witness standard.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Michael J. Hutter | July 31, 2019
In his Evidence column, Michael J. Hutter discusses 'People v. Smith', writing that the decision—including both the opinion of the Court of Appeals and the dissenting opinion of Justices Carni and Lindley—is required reading for a trial lawyer, as it complements the missing witness charge as provided in NY PJI3d and CJ2d.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...