New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Timothy M. Tippins | March 15, 2019
In his Matrimonial Practice column, Timothy M. Tippins provides a detailed analysis of the recent decision in 'J.F. v. D.F,' which “vividly exemplifies what can happen when experts fail to establish and maintain a clearly defined role in the assignments they undertake.”
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Jules Epstein | March 15, 2019
In a trial, or in a Congressional hearing, it is fair to test a witness' credibility. Congress has no rules of evidence—but those applied at trial are informative and help the discussion of whether Cohen's having girlfriends while married is fair game.
By Vanessa Blum | March 14, 2019
Are rules that guard against forged or tampered evidence enough to prevent deepfake videos from making their way into court cases?
By Lynn Kappelman and Ryan Tilot | March 13, 2019
As courts and jurors become more comfortable with digital signatures, the process of admitting digitally signed documents will get easier. In the meantime, beyond meeting the technical requirements for admission, take the time to explain the digital signature process to jurors (and judges) in lay terms.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Lynn K. Neuner and William T. Russell Jr. | March 13, 2019
In their New York Court of Appeals Roundup, William T. Russell Jr. and Lynn K. Neuner discuss 'People v. Diaz', in which the Court of Appeals recently issued a decision with important implications for the privacy concerns of individuals in pretrial detention.
By Jason Grant | March 11, 2019
The lawsuit was lodged in November 2012, just weeks after Superstorm Sandy devastated the New York area, and it was brought on behalf of tenants at the adjacent 2 Gold Street and 201 Pearl Street buildings, both of which were evacuated and sustained major storm damage, court records say.
By Tom McParland | March 4, 2019
Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings on Monday said that a nonprofit group was conducting an independent review of decades-old criminal convictions in cases involving "potentially questionable" hair evidence.
By Jason Grant | March 4, 2019
“Here, the city did not deny the existence of the [weightlifting] incident report or submit any evidence, but simply asserted that the delay [in receiving the notice of claim] will prejudice its investigation due to fading memories and the possible changed condition of the [weightlifting] equipment," the appeals panel wrote.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Michael Rikon | March 4, 2019
In his Condemnation and Tax Certiorari column, Michael Rikon writes: It can be shown that prior appraisals must be maintained by the appraiser. And once that appraiser has testified, any conditional immunity a prior report had disappeared. An appraiser can be substantially impeached by the prior appraisal.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Jack A. Gordon and Alex T. Paradiso | March 4, 2019
Practitioners in need of trial or deposition testimony (in either a state or federal civil case) of a witness in a government custody should consider seeking a Writ in federal court to obtain same.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...