New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Raymond Radigan and John G. Farinacci | November 1, 2019
In their Trusts and Estate Law column, C. Raymond Radigan and John G. Farinacci conclude a series of articles about contested probate proceedings in the Surrogate's Court by focusing on the trial and pre-trial considerations.
Connecticut Law Tribune | Event|News|Profile
By Robert Storace | October 30, 2019
Colleagues describe Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara Bailey Jongbloed, President Donald Trump's nominee for the federal bench, as a diligent jurist.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Elsie Gonzalez | October 25, 2019
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently grappled with this question in 'Landau v. Landau.'
By Raychel Lean | October 24, 2019
One of the rulings suggests that strict procedural rules for criminal contempt aren't always compatible with courtroom safety.
By Dan M. Clark | October 21, 2019
While the hearing isn't intended to focus on just one issue involving children in the state's court system, Dinowitz said he's particularly interested in how forensic evaluators are used in family matters.
By Meredith Hobbs | October 21, 2019
After a law firm presentation to Google's Atlanta women's group, Google made a referral agreement with the midsized firm to serve as a resource for the tech giant's local employees for family law, estate planning or other issues.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Michael E. Bertin | October 21, 2019
The interplay between motions for reconsideration and timely appeals is one that can cause trouble if the litigant and attorneys are not careful.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Toby Kleinman and Daniel Pollack | October 21, 2019
Courts are known for their many rules and regulations. While there are times a family court judge may properly make exceptions to the rules, too many exceptions, or exceptions contrary to accepted science, may reduce transparency and accountability, may undermine predictability, and may not be in the interest of justice. What can attorneys do?
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Joel R. Brandes | October 18, 2019
There is a substantial difference between fundamental error and harmless error. An attorney considering an appeal must consider this distinction when advising a client whether or not to take an appeal from an adverse order or judgment.
By Jason Grant | October 16, 2019
In its ruling pertaining to the new child, an Appellate Division, First Department panel further pointed out that "none of the [five] siblings who are the subjects of those [2016] findings have been returned to respondent's [the mother's] care."
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Atlantic City, NJ office for a Gaming attorney. The rapidly expanding Gaming Department is...
Yardi is a global software company providing innovative property management solutions and services in every real estate market. We are focus...
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A. is a Boutique Wage and Hour Litigation law firm. Candidates should have 2-3 years litigation experience. The ex...