By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | September 1, 2017
Trial court correctly held that mother was in contempt of the court's order but erred in not imposing sanctions for mother's repeated, flagrant and ongoing contempt of orders related to child custody because no sanctions for flagrant abuse of court orders was an a abuse of discretion and father could challenge the order as a collateral order. Reversed in part and affirmed in part.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | September 1, 2017
Where the parents had a history of poor communication, primary physical custody of the child was awarded to mother who had a more flexible schedule.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | September 1, 2017
The trial court erred in holding that wife could negate a recital affirming her knowledge of the parties' marital estate based on her subsequent assertion that she did not know the full extent of the martial assets when she executed a property settlement agreement. The court reversed a trial court order imposing a constructive trust.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | September 1, 2017
The trial court did not err in denying wife's petition seeking to invalidate the parties' property settlement agreement as its properly chose to adhere to its prior rulings and barred wife from seeking to invalidate an agreement she had successfully enforced. The court affirmed a trial court order denying wife relief.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | September 1, 2017
The court concluded that for purposes of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, the retention date of a child is the date beyond which the noncustodial parent no longer consents to the child's continued habitation with the custodial parent and seeks to reassert custody rights. The court affirmed an order denying father's Hague Convention petition.
By MARY ALICE ROBBINS | August 31, 2017
Former Dallas Cowboys cornerback and Pro Hall of Famer Deoin Sanders isn't likely to be performing one of his famous touchdown dances in the wake of a Fifth Court of Appeals decision on Aug. 29.
By Law Journal Editorial Board | August 28, 2017
Recognizing a "special justification," the New Jersey Supreme Court abandoned the Baures standard for deciding contested relocation disputes and acknowledged such "special justification" is found "where experience teaches that a rule of law has not achieved its intended result."
By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | August 28, 2017
Motion to Dismiss Complaint Alleging Same- Sex Common-Law Marriage Claim Granted
By therecorder | The Recorder | August 28, 2017
C.A. 4th; G053820 The Fourth Appellate District affirmed a family court judgment. The court held that a spouse who failed to request temporary spousal…
By therecorder | The Recorder | August 28, 2017
C.A. 4th; D070346 The Fourth Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that great-grandparents were not equivalent to grandparents for purposes…
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Yardi is a global software company providing innovative property management solutions and services in every real estate market. We are focus...
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A. is a Boutique Wage and Hour Litigation law firm. Candidates should have 2-3 years litigation experience. The ex...
McHenry & Horan, P.C. is a legacy medical malpractice defense firm with offices in Uniondale, NY. We are well respected for our expertis...