Family Law

  • New York Law Journal

    Orrick Partner Joins Appeal of Family Court Order Allowing Unannounced Visits to DV Survivor's Home

    By Jane Wester | December 7, 2023

    Attorneys say they hope their case will end the practice: "We're proud to take on this fight to protect basic American freedoms, said Orrick's Naomi Scotten.

  • Texas Lawyer

    Pros and Cons: The Role of Consultants in Child Custody Battles

    By Elisa Reiter, Daniel Pollack and Jeffrey Siegel | December 7, 2023

    Consultants can help litigants learn to better adapt, to communicate politely and succinctly, and to help give children stable homes and healthy choices. Should their artistry be disclosed in discovery?

  • New York Law Journal | Analysis

    When U.S. Citizens Must Choose Between Love and Country

    By Mariko Hirose | December 7, 2023

    When a U.S. citizen marries a noncitizen, the foreign spouse does not automatically obtain the right to live in the United States permanently. Instead, if the spouse does not have permanent status already, the U.S. citizen must submit a petition and accede to the process of proving the marital relationship to USCIS. Should the consular officer's fateful decision to issue a spousal visa be subject to any degree of judicial oversight? In a petition for certiorari before the U.S. Supreme Court, the Solicitor General is urging the court to take up the question and answer it in the negative to the detriment of millions of U.S. citizens.

  • New York Law Journal | Commentary

    Why AFCs Should Not Be Appointed To Represent Non-Communicative Toddlers in Custody Disputes

    By Peter J. Galasso | December 6, 2023

    Peter Galasso has previously argued to multiple jurists that AFCs should not be appointed to represent toddlers in child custody cases. Due to the absence of guidance from the Appellate Division, this argument has yet to gain traction in the minds of judges responsible for the appointment of AFCs for toddlers. To safeguard the integrity of the judiciary and to save our clients a substantial amount of money in the process, this misguided practice needs to end.

  • New York Law Journal

    Protecting Children of Divorce Against Weaponized Social Media, Part 3: How Automatic Orders Against the Use of Harmful Social Media Offer Protection for Children

    By Gus Dimopoulos | December 5, 2023

    In this three-part series, Gus Dimopoulos uses recent decisions such as Kassenoff v. Kassenoff and Walsh v. Russell to discuss the detrimental effects of social media on children in divorce cases and the importance the above rulings have on protecting children of divorcing parents. This final part looks at what's being done to stop harmful content at its source, and how the New York court administration should make the benefits of recent holdings available to all divorce litigants and their children through standing, automatic orders precluding disparaging posts about the parties and their children.

  • The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary

    Special Immigrant Juvenile Status: Does It Exist in Pennsylvania?

    By Lawrence J. Persick | November 28, 2023

    I think we are all starting to see how this piece of federal legislation has caused a headache for state courts. While state court judges are not actually making immigration determinations, they are being asked to make all of the factual determinations underlying an immigration decision and, with a number of judges, that does not sit well.

  • New York Law Journal

    Protecting Children of Divorce Against Weaponized Social Media, Part 2: What's Being Done?

    By Gus Dimopoulos | November 28, 2023

    The use of social media as a weapon in custody cases is a pressing concern. In February and March, he Appellate Division, Second Department ruled on two groundbreaking cases that address the issue—Kassenoff v. Kassenoff and Walsh v. Russell—deciding that narrowly tailored orders prohibiting a divorce litigant from posting on social media during a divorce are constitutionally permissible if the speech to be restrained is likely to produce a serious danger to children. In his three-part series, Gus Dimopoulos, a representative for Allan Kassenoff, the litigant who succeeded in obtaining an order prohibiting social media posting in his divorce, examines the importance the above rulings have on protecting children of divorcing parents. This Part 2 looks at how social media companies and the courts are falling short on providing protection to children.

  • New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary

    Parental Alienation: Psychological 'Syndrome' or 'Junk Science'?

    By Matheu D. Nunn, Linda Torosian and Alyssa S. Engleberg | November 24, 2023

    Divorce litigants do awful things to each other—and children—in the context of matrimonial litigation, but allegations of parental alienation are serious and can have a significant impact on the case. There are several "camps" of parental alienation advocates and detractors. There are the "true believers" who believe that parental alienation is a condition, and others believe it is junk science.

  • Daily Business Review | Commentary

    The Giving of Friends and Family This Holiday Season

    By Rebecca L. Palmer | November 21, 2023

    As we all stand on the cusp of the holiday season, your closest friends may inspire your holiday joy and act as your lifeline to positive mental health.

  • New York Law Journal

    Protecting Children of Divorce Against Weaponized Social Media, Part 1: Exploring the Harmful Effects

    By Gus Dimopoulos | November 21, 2023

    In his three-part series, Gus Dimopoulos uses recent decisions such as and 'Kassenoff v. Kassenoff' and 'Walsh v. Russell' to discuss the detrimental effects of social media on children in divorce cases and the importance the above rulings have on protecting children of divorcing parents. Part Two in this series will look at how social media companies and the courts are falling short on providing protection. Part Three will examine what's being done about it.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
November 27, 2024
London

Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.


Learn More
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More

Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for an attorney in our renowned Labor & Employment Department, working...


Apply Now ›

Our client, a large, privately-owned healthcare company, has engaged us to find an Assistant General Counsel for their headquarters located ...


Apply Now ›

A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...


Apply Now ›