By Jason Grant | August 9, 2019
The rule greatly increases the reach of “expedited removal” to potentially hundreds of thousands of additional migrants. It applies to any migrant arrested anywhere in the country who came into the U.S. illegally and who can't show that they’ve lived continuously in the U.S. for at least two years.
By Patrick Smith | August 8, 2019
With these new additions, Dorsey said, its immigration practice group has grown to more than 18 lawyers and legal professionals.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Charles Toutant | August 2, 2019
With disputes arising in several New Jersey counties over an attorney general directive placing limits on police cooperation with federal immigration agents, attention has turned to how potential litigation would play out in court.
By Nate Robson | August 2, 2019
U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss said the rule violates federal immigration laws and violates the Administrative Procedures Act.
By Dan Packel | August 1, 2019
Erika Collins, who was co-chair of Proskauer's international labor and employment practice, says she reached out soon after reading about Epstein Becker's deal with Deloitte on LinkedIn.
By Victoria Hudgins | August 1, 2019
The American Bar Association will initially work with three legal aid organizations to better connect attorneys to children facing deportation, many of whom lack legal representation.
By P.J. D'Annunzio | July 31, 2019
The court said in a precedential decision that a pair of undocumented immigrants stopped for speeding should be able to make the case that the evidence used to start deportation proceedings against them was gathered unconstitutionally.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By P.J. D'Annunzio | July 31, 2019
A federal appeals court has ruled that a pair of undocumented immigrants stopped for speeding in Pennsylvania should have had the chance to present a case that the evidence used to start deportation proceedings against them was gathered unconstitutionally.
By Marcia Coyle | July 26, 2019
The court was divided. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan would not have disturbed an injunction.
By Marcia Coyle | July 26, 2019
The court was divided. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan would not have disturbed an injunction.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Legislative Liaison (Posting #374-24) The Department of Children and Families (DCF) has an immediate opportunity for qualified individu...
The Los Angeles office of Epstein Becker & Green is seeking a partner-level attorney to work in its growing national management-side Emp...
Note: This position is hybrid, however, it is discretionary, and the office location is in Bradenton, Florida.Note: The salary range reflect...