Corporate Attorneys Fear NLRB Will Implement Policies Making Union Organizing Easier
Many believe the NLRB will implement much of the Employee Free Choice Act through regulation.
October 31, 2010 at 08:00 PM
2 minute read
Cover Story: Mid Term Report
Management-side labor attorneys are keeping a close eye on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) now that three of its four members have strong ties to organized labor (two seated by recess appointment when Congress stalled their confirmations). Many believe the NLRB will pick up the mantle dropped by pro-union members of Congress and implement much of the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) through regulation.
“We call it 'EFCA-by-Stealth,' coming in through the back door,” says Ken Yerkes, a partner at Barnes &Thornburg.
Alarm bells went off in June when the NLRB issued a Request for Information (RFI) on technology that could enable electronic voting in union representation elections. The RFI seeks information on secure electronic voting systems, raising fears of offsite elections allowing unions to manipulate votingand intimidate workers casting votes outside the workplace.
During a speech at the InsideCounsel/Fisher & Phillips National Labor Symposium in September, Former NLRB member Peter Schaumber, who had recently stepped down, dismissed suggestions that the RIF was not a step toward implementing offsite elections.
“To the extent it is suggested that this request for information did not intend to reach out to offsite electronic voting, that is plain misinformation,” Schaumber said. “I was there. The board will seek to augment union power during organizing campaigns.”
The board could also in effect implement EFCA through rules changes including shortening election timeframes, thereby reducing the time employers have to convince employees to vote against union representation, and granting unions more pre-election access to employees in the workplace.
“One reason some EFCA supporters in the Senate aren't pushing it is that they see it can happen through rulemaking,” Yerkes says.
Schaumber told the National Labor Symposium that a wave of pro-union decisions issued in late August just before his departure demonstrates the determination of the board to support union issues.
“The board has shown in these decisions a startling aggressive, results oriented agenda aimed at enhancing union power and making it easier to organize, regardless of board precedent,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Seemingly Simple Off-Channel Communication Rules Still Vex Finance Industry
5 minute readSEC Enforcement Chief Grewal—Whose Hard Line on Crypto Tormented the Industry—Stepping Down
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250