Fewer countries enforcing anti-bribery laws
Transparency International recently reviewed data about the 40 countries that signed the Organization for Economic Cooperations 1997 Anti-Bribery Convention agreement, and the results are disheartening.
October 09, 2013 at 07:04 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Transparency International recently reviewed data about the 40 countries that signed the Organization for Economic Cooperation's 1997 Anti-Bribery Convention agreement, and the results are disheartening.
According to the annual review, only eight of the 40 countries are considered “steady enforcers” of bribery laws. Of these, four (10 percent) were considered “moderate enforcers” and four “active enforcers.” The number in the active category dropped from the seven countries in the category in 2012.
This means that 32 of the countries in the agreement fall into the two lowest categories: “limited enforcement” and “little or no enforcement.” In order to be classified in the active or moderate categories, countries much have launched or finished at least one major case in the last four years.
The countries that are considered active are the U.S., the U.K., Germany and Switzerland, while the moderate enforcers are Austria, Australia, Finland and Italy. Italy was demoted in this year's study because recent enforcement information was unavailable.
Dropping this year were Norway and Denmark, which fell from the active category to the limited category. Falling from moderate to limited were Argentina, Canada, France and Sweden. Five of the 20 countries in the “little or no enforcement” category dropped from the “moderate enforcement” rank: Belgium, Japan, the Netherlands, South Korea and Spain.
Some countries did improve, however. Bulgaria, Hungary and Portugal moved up from the “little enforcement” category and South Africa moved up from “no enforcement.”
“The 40 countries, which represent more than two-thirds of global exports, would make it very hard to get away with bribery if they lived up to the requirements of the OECD anti-bribery convention,” said Huguette Labelle, chair of Transparency International, in a statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Seemingly Simple Off-Channel Communication Rules Still Vex Finance Industry
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250