Editor's comment: In the firing line
Poor old Eversheds. Straight after Legal Week this month reported the firm was piloting an outsourcing venture with its South African ally, the venture was subjected to a series of caustic remarks in the media spread across five separate articles within a week. The source of the sustained criticism was Eversheds' apparently ill-fated flirtation with commoditisation and low-end work.
January 27, 2010 at 05:38 AM
3 minute read
Eversheds doesn't deserve the recent flak
Poor old Eversheds. Straight after Legal Week this month reported the firm was piloting an outsourcing venture with its South African ally, the venture was subjected to a series of caustic remarks in the media spread across five separate articles within a week. The source of the sustained criticism was Eversheds' apparently ill-fated flirtation with commoditisation and low-end work.
The timing of this seems odd, since the firm has had a sizeable bulk division in Cardiff for donkey's years. And let us not forget that Eversheds won widespread plaudits several years back for its innovative partnering deal with Tyco, which required a fair amount of commoditisation.
True, national and regional law firms used to fret about the brand impact of bulk arms in the 1990s, when they were attempting to build 'proper' City reps. But this reservation was in the main because such businesses were tackling retail work more in tune with high street law rather than any inherent problem with commoditisation. In contrast, the current push is about parcelling up areas like contract review and due diligence that large plc clients want to outsource. And the market was a very different place in the mid-1990s. Talking about re-engineering legal services was once a sign you lacked class – now many major law firms regard it as a badge of honour.
Neither is commoditisation restricted to national firms – the finance practices of major City firms have for years wrestled, not always very happily, with such pressures for certain kinds of capital markets and structured finance work. It is true that managing the right mix between commodity services and bespoke, high-end work is something that has troubled business in general for years, and there are few easy answers on striking the perfect balance. But there are no shortage of companies that have managed to service both ends of the market – including half the world's banks.
So what Eversheds' grave sin is, I'm not sure. The firm has had its share of challenges in recent years but one of the consistently brighter points has been the touches of imagination it has shown, as illustrated by the Tyco deal, and a willingness to invest in the infrastructure to support alternative fee deals. Likewise, as I've argued before, it would be a healthy thing for some law firms to enter the LPO market – competition from law firms will encourage the current players to raise their game. Surely clients will benefit and law firms will get a useful chance to experiment with different models, helping them update their own businesses' processes. Still, maybe Eversheds will get the last laugh. After our story came out, they had enquiries from two multibillion-pound companies interested in the pilot.
For more, see Eversheds gears up to launch its own outsourcing business.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMcDermott Hits Paul Hastings In London Again As Macfarlanes Also Swoops For Talent
2 minute readRe-Examining Values: Greenberg Traurig's Executive Chairman on the Lessons of the Pandemic
4 minute readDiversity Commitments Feel Hollow When Firms Cosy Up to Oppressive Regimes
Trending Stories
- 1Miami Attorneys Secure $4M Settlement Despite Insurance Limits
- 2NY Judge Admonished Over Contributions to Progressive Political Causes
- 3Legaltech Rundown: Alexi Launches an AI Litigation Tool, Hotshot Announces Private Equity Practice Courses, and More
- 46-48. It’s Comp Time Again: How To Crush Your Comp Memo
- 5'Religious Discrimination'?: 4th Circuit Revives Challenge to Employer Vaccine Mandate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250