Editor's comment: Branded, good and bad
'Eversheds and Superbrands - really? I mean, really?' The email I received last week from an acquaintance on another publication summed up the mood of dismissive ire that greeted the news that Eversheds outranked the entire magic circle in the annual Superbrands poll.
March 03, 2010 at 07:04 PM
3 minute read
There are two kinds of brand – but only one is essential
'Eversheds and Superbrands – really? I mean, really?' The email I received last week from an acquaintance on another publication summed up the mood of dismissive ire that greeted the news that Eversheds outranked the entire magic circle in the annual Superbrands poll.
It's understandable. However scientific or rigorous the ranking in question is, trying to compile a single benchmark that compares wildly different businesses is always going to be very hard, even if you are ranking something easily quantifiable. Trying it with something as nebulous as a brand takes it to a whole other level. For similar reasons I take these things about as seriously as I do The Sunday Times' best employer index, which isn't very. There is a limit to how much stock you can invest in a ranking that puts Apple outside the top 10 and concludes that the Law Society is the top-rated legal brand; I know the City isn't Chancery Lane's core constituency, but I've never had the sense that it's that well regarded, even by high street lawyers.
But it's easy to quibble and what such surveys do, to a certain extent, is highlight the element of brand that is about wider awareness. On this broad church element, Eversheds has been pretty successful at getting its name out there, both with the general business community but also with general counsel. (However, it is mystifying to see DLA Piper – surely the best projected and the most upwardly mobile UK legal brand of the last 20 years – not make the list.)
This 'general awareness' bit of branding is a funny thing. Like turning a supertanker, it takes a long time before your efforts make any impact and it can keep going in a certain direction long after you have stopped steering that course. This kind of brand has its value, especially as strong brands have always covered a multitude of sins, though it can differ enormously from the current reality. The tag 'magic circle' has become the most recognisable brand in commercial law. And many City firms have built strong institutional brands that demonstrably deliver value by giving them a shot at handling high-end corporate and securities work.
But the reality is that in most industries there is a kind of inner brand that reflects the experiences of those who deal with your business most regularly: staff, clients, service providers, rivals and closely interested observers. And, unlike the aforementioned tanker, this vehicle can turn on a dime, responding very quickly to changes in the business, both good and bad. To be really successful over the long term any business brand must deliver on this measure – or rather, the brand will come to reflect the successful reality of the business. That kind of brand, which for a law firm is a composite of your best lawyers, client base and financial performance, you can't do business without.
For more, see Eversheds rated as top law firm brand in 2010 Superbrands rankings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMcDermott Hits Paul Hastings In London Again As Macfarlanes Also Swoops For Talent
2 minute readRe-Examining Values: Greenberg Traurig's Executive Chairman on the Lessons of the Pandemic
4 minute readDiversity Commitments Feel Hollow When Firms Cosy Up to Oppressive Regimes
Trending Stories
- 16-48. It’s Comp Time Again: How To Crush Your Comp Memo
- 2'Religious Discrimination'?: 4th Circuit Revives Challenge to Employer Vaccine Mandate
- 3Fight Over Amicus-Funding Disclosure Surfaces in Google Play Appeal
- 4The Power of Student Prior Knowledge in Legal Education
- 5Chicago Cubs' IP Claim to Continue Against Wrigley View Rooftop, Judge Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250