Editor's comment: That boring revival
I'm not planning on writing much about results this year because there isn't much to say that wasn't obvious a long time ago. In the wake of the banking crisis, the 2008-09 year delivered a jolt to law firm finances and led to a string of dramatic restructurings. But it has been apparent for at least six months that major law firms have been hauling themselves into recovery mode, in relative terms at least. The first indications for 2009-10 do nothing to change the sense that law firms have passed the worst, having now stripped down their cost bases for less bountiful years ahead. In essence, the UK's top 25 firms are generally falling into two not-dissimilar camps. On one hand you have practices expected to hold steady or marginally increase their turnover. Probably the larger group, certainly the one that includes more of the largest City and national law firms, is set for marginal falls in revenue against 2008-09.
May 11, 2010 at 12:44 AM
3 minute read
The predictable recovery grinds into gear
I'm not planning on writing much about results this year because there isn't much to say that wasn't obvious a long time ago. In the wake of the banking crisis, the 2008-09 year delivered a jolt to law firm finances and led to a string of dramatic restructurings. But it has been apparent for at least six months that major law firms have been hauling themselves into recovery mode, in relative terms at least.
The first indications for 2009-10 do nothing to change the sense that law firms have passed the worst, having now stripped down their cost bases for less bountiful years ahead. In essence, the UK's top 25 firms are generally falling into two not-dissimilar camps. On one hand you have practices expected to hold steady or marginally increase their turnover. Probably the larger group, certainly the one that includes more of the largest City and national law firms, is set for marginal falls in revenue against 2008-09.
Profits are harder to gauge at this point, but the consensus is that, for leaner and meaner inhabitants of the legal jungle, profits per equity partner (PEP) are set to start rising again at a fair number of practices. Certainly, it would be surprising if the top 50 saw a repeat of last year, when PEP collectively fell by 17.3%. There is another reason to believe the results will look comparatively better than last year: the relative ease it has taken to get a steer from leading firms – a stark contrast to 2009, when many tried to delay announcing numbers until the last possible moment.
If there is something predictable about the way the 2009-10 year is shaping up, another theme has become equally familiar. That is the extent to which the commercial legal profession has continually and materially exceeded the gloomy predictions made about its financial prospects, both from inside and outside the profession. At this stage last May, an experienced consultant emailed me to argue that Legal Week was being too optimistic in its predictions based on the feedback he was getting in the market. As it turned out, we did initially err slightly, but we were actually a tad too bearish on the performance that was confirmed during the late summer. If observers have generally been too apocalyptic, so have many partners. Our quarterly business confidence poll has found partners to have been consistently more downbeat with their market forecasts than the performance that has ultimately been delivered.
Of course, the UK and global economy remains very vulnerable to further shocks and faltering confidence – as political events at home and in Europe over the last week have reminded us. But providing another market meltdown is avoided, law firms are well on course for recovery. Let's just hope the country can manage the same trick.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMcDermott Hits Paul Hastings In London Again As Macfarlanes Also Swoops For Talent
2 minute readRe-Examining Values: Greenberg Traurig's Executive Chairman on the Lessons of the Pandemic
4 minute readDiversity Commitments Feel Hollow When Firms Cosy Up to Oppressive Regimes
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250