Editor's comment: Back to bulging
Well, it looks like the City's largest firms can kiss what little hope they had of securing a deal with a top Wall Street practice goodbye. Based on the 2009 results from The American Lawyer, Manhattan's legal elite have comprehensively disproved the widespread claim that their business model would falter in a recession. Instead, New York's most profitable law firms have emerged as the clear winners in 2009, outperforming the average US top 100 firm by a significant margin. This is the group of firms, typified by Sullivan & Cromwell and Cravath Swaine & Moore, that either exclusively focus on the US or maintain only lean and targeted foreign operations. This club also largely refused to make redundancies or cut associate salaries, a conservatism that earned them the scorn of some rivals and observers who argued they were badly out of step with the Great Reset, the New Normal or whatever it was called that week.
May 19, 2010 at 04:50 AM
3 minute read
New York's elite defy the prophets of doom
Well, it looks like the City's largest firms can kiss what little hope they had of securing a deal with a top Wall Street practice goodbye. Based on the 2009 results from The American Lawyer, Manhattan's legal elite have comprehensively disproved the widespread claim that their business model would falter in a recession. Instead, New York's most profitable law firms have emerged as the clear winners in 2009, outperforming the average US top 100 firm by a significant margin.
This is the group of firms, typified by Sullivan & Cromwell and Cravath Swaine & Moore, that either exclusively focus on the US or maintain only lean and targeted foreign operations. This club also largely refused to make redundancies or cut associate salaries, a conservatism that earned them the scorn of some rivals and observers who argued they were badly out of step with the Great Reset, the New Normal or whatever it was called that week.
Having in reality seen their focused and expansion-phobic model defy the critics, you can bet your bottom dollar that the lesson these firms will take from 2009, rightly or wrongly, is that it's definitely not broke so they don't need to fix it. That will make them even more loath to consider major structural reform or to substantially bulk up abroad. It will certainly make them even more dismissive of the concept of a cross-border merger (if that's possible). And who can blame them? You can believe that, in the long term, prospects are very bright for firms like Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Latham & Watkins, but the plain reality is that what Manhattan's top firms do works well for them – and looks set to continue to do so.
Elsewhere, the fortunes of the rest of the top 100 seem to be diverging considerably. Below the top corporate and litigation firms, it was an underwhelming year for the US top 50, which saw eight firms face double-digit percentage falls in revenue. The next 50 down, being in a better position to benefit from a push for value, had a better time of it.
The story of the legal services recession has tended to split between those arguing it would be about a flight to quality and those predicting a dash for value. The experience of the world's largest legal market suggests that it has been both, but some firms have failed to benefit from either trend. Although given how wrong some of the predictions have been about where this is all going, the best advice is to keep a close watch on your business and plan where you will be a year from now with a brutally critical eye. Not on the basis of some grandiose trend, but in reality.
For more, see Wall Street's legal elite stage recovery but fees fall at US top 100
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMcDermott Hits Paul Hastings In London Again As Macfarlanes Also Swoops For Talent
2 minute readRe-Examining Values: Greenberg Traurig's Executive Chairman on the Lessons of the Pandemic
4 minute readDiversity Commitments Feel Hollow When Firms Cosy Up to Oppressive Regimes
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250